The Immortal Slacker
2008-12-14, 11:56
Although the attack was horrible, it did have a good unexpected side-effect. It's making obvious that the media is propaganda and throwing around lies mixed with some truth to serve their political interests.
I've done some research on this and the more you dig around on the internet, the more BS you find.
1. When the attacks began, immediately Al-Qaeda was balmed, even though experts said that it was too early to say that and the attacks certainly weren't Al-Qaeda's style.
( http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/11/27/asia/28group.php )
2. Then a group called Deccan Mujahideen was blamed. Global terrorism experts said they've never even heard of such a group.
( http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/11/27/asia/28group.php )
3. Then the Guardian said "What is likely is that the attacks will get blamed on Pakistan and its Inter-Services Intelligence agency (ISI)"
( http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/nov/2...tacks-terrorism )
(4. Then Pakistan was blamed everywhere.)
5. Then it was British-born Pakistans.
( http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/nov/2...rrorists-mumbai )
6. Then the witnesses were interviewed and they said that some of the terrorists were white and even blonde and drank beer before the attack. MUSLIMS DON'T DRINK ALCOHOL!! So the attackers certainly weren't muslim.
"Locals say the orgy of killings in Mumbai began here. Three men walked into the cafe, drank beer, settled their bills and walked out. Then they fished out guns from their bags and began firing ... They did not look Indian, they looked foreign. One of them, I thought, had blonde hair. The other had a punkish hairstyle. They were neatly dressed"
( http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7752625.stm )
7. Then another terrorist group was blamed - Lashkar-e-Taiba.
( http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/...ai-attacks.html )
8. Also some dude claims of a local mafia boss carrying out the attacks. But this mafia boss is also known for working with the CIA and Al-Qaeda.
( http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_4068.shtml )
9. Pak tv says it was the zionists and the attack was a false flag operation.
( http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/P...how/3785654.cms )
Notice that the sources I posted are very popular and highly-esteemed newspapers and such (except for onlinejournal), not just some "conspiracy thierist" stuff.
So my point is, that whatever you know about this attack, is probably propaganda cause something very fishy is going on.
I've done some research on this and the more you dig around on the internet, the more BS you find.
1. When the attacks began, immediately Al-Qaeda was balmed, even though experts said that it was too early to say that and the attacks certainly weren't Al-Qaeda's style.
( http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/11/27/asia/28group.php )
2. Then a group called Deccan Mujahideen was blamed. Global terrorism experts said they've never even heard of such a group.
( http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/11/27/asia/28group.php )
3. Then the Guardian said "What is likely is that the attacks will get blamed on Pakistan and its Inter-Services Intelligence agency (ISI)"
( http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/nov/2...tacks-terrorism )
(4. Then Pakistan was blamed everywhere.)
5. Then it was British-born Pakistans.
( http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/nov/2...rrorists-mumbai )
6. Then the witnesses were interviewed and they said that some of the terrorists were white and even blonde and drank beer before the attack. MUSLIMS DON'T DRINK ALCOHOL!! So the attackers certainly weren't muslim.
"Locals say the orgy of killings in Mumbai began here. Three men walked into the cafe, drank beer, settled their bills and walked out. Then they fished out guns from their bags and began firing ... They did not look Indian, they looked foreign. One of them, I thought, had blonde hair. The other had a punkish hairstyle. They were neatly dressed"
( http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7752625.stm )
7. Then another terrorist group was blamed - Lashkar-e-Taiba.
( http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/...ai-attacks.html )
8. Also some dude claims of a local mafia boss carrying out the attacks. But this mafia boss is also known for working with the CIA and Al-Qaeda.
( http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_4068.shtml )
9. Pak tv says it was the zionists and the attack was a false flag operation.
( http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/P...how/3785654.cms )
Notice that the sources I posted are very popular and highly-esteemed newspapers and such (except for onlinejournal), not just some "conspiracy thierist" stuff.
So my point is, that whatever you know about this attack, is probably propaganda cause something very fishy is going on.