View Full Version : Jack Boot defends his jewish masters and bans 11 Stormfront veterans
Soldatul Vostru
December 15th, 2010, 12:12 PM
I just got the news. Tragic, itz!
JAKE HECK
publicist-sycophant-beloved pet
Nov 3 2010 - Dec 14 2010
We hardly knew ye.
It's unfortunate that he insulted Alex, and was therefore banned. It should have been you who was banned instead.
Celtic_Patriot
December 15th, 2010, 12:17 PM
I fear the long dark will be coming soon, Pat.
No because "or" is not "is".
To directly accuse somone of being "a" Jew is different than saying "or".
Saying someone is either a Jew or a Neocon is not saying they are definitely one or the other. "Or" does not mean "Is".
Direct accusations is what Linder disallows.
.
Donnie in Ohio
December 15th, 2010, 12:19 PM
It's unfortunate that he insulted Alex, and was therefore banned. It should have been you who was banned instead.
Yea well, sometimes you get the boot, sometimes the boot gets you, as it were.
Sic Semper Morons
Soldatul Vostru
December 15th, 2010, 12:21 PM
Yea well, sometimes you get the boot, sometimes the boot gets you, as it were.
Sic Semper Morons
How does that make me a 'moron'? This is exactly what I mean, you came in here only to disrupt. You may have Alex fooled, but you're not fooling me - you're no fucking WN.
See how N.Wolf stated his case about the presidents not being Jews? He did it without trolling, and therefore no one has a problem with him.
Celtic_Patriot
December 15th, 2010, 12:21 PM
Sic Semper Morons
Sick Semper Fi.
My pen will always be sharper than yours Donnie.
.
Ann2
December 15th, 2010, 12:21 PM
I just got the news. Tragic, itz!
JAKE HECK
publicist-sycophant-beloved pet
Nov 3 2010 - Dec 14 2010
We hardly knew ye.
Yes...I almost cried a tear.:D
Donnie in Ohio
December 15th, 2010, 12:25 PM
How does that make me a 'moron'? This is exactly what I mean, you came in here only to disrupt. You may have Alex fooled, but you're not fooling me - you're no fucking WN.
I was referring to the late unlamented Jake Heck.
Your opinion is duly noted, and once again, as in most roadhouses, opinions vary.
Donnie in Ohio
December 15th, 2010, 12:28 PM
Sick Semper Fi.
My pen will always be sharper than yours Donnie.
Yea? But I'm taller.
You a fellow Marine, CP?
Soldatul Vostru
December 15th, 2010, 12:40 PM
I was referring to the late unlamented Jake Heck.
Your opinion is duly noted, and once again, as in most roadhouses, opinions vary.
Alright, fair enough, I won't call you names either then. And I also don't want to derail this thread any further then it already is, so I'll just leave it at that.
Armstrong
December 15th, 2010, 12:42 PM
How does that make me a 'moron'? This is exactly what I mean, you came in here only to disrupt. You may have Alex fooled, but you're not fooling me - you're no fucking WN.
See how N.Wolf stated his case about the presidents not being Jews? He did it without trolling, and therefore no one has a problem with him.
He's not even here for discussion, he's here for disruption
Leonard Rouse
December 15th, 2010, 12:42 PM
Does Telnet and FidoNet mean anything?
.
Do*
Telnet, of course. But FidoNet. . .that's a blast from the past!
Defender
December 15th, 2010, 12:46 PM
This is also how I addressed stormfront
http://susan1219.wordpress.com/2010/12/15/if-we-lose-there-will-not-be-any-more-freedom-of-speech/
Donnie in Ohio
December 15th, 2010, 12:50 PM
He's not even here for discussion, he's here for disruption
What part of "this thread is in Nutzpah" don't you understand?
You lot see this thread as some sort of official report documenting a grave development in American, nay, World-Wide White Nationalism.
I see it as people bitching about being banned from an Internet forum.
Ann2
December 15th, 2010, 01:01 PM
He's not even here for discussion, he's here for disruption
So what are you here for Mr. I saved the life of a muslim nigger? You claim your not a WN, so what's the deal?
Soldatul Vostru
December 15th, 2010, 01:06 PM
What part of "this thread is in Nutzpah" don't you understand?
You lot see this thread as some sort of official report documenting grave development in American, nay, World-Wide White Nationalism.
I see it as people bitching about being banned from an Internet forum.
The thread is in 'Nutzpah', true, and a lot of it is 'people bitching about being banned from an internet forum', but there is also more to it than that, namely the 9/11 issue. Granted there have been some posts made that are a bit 'out there', but there were also a lot of posts with good info, and posts we can learn from.
I believe Mossad was behind 9/11, I'm about 99% certain of it, however, I don't know how they did it. But there were people in here discussing that, one is now gone. I would however like to see this thread get back on that topic.
N. Wolf
December 15th, 2010, 01:30 PM
It doesn't matter that this thread is in the Nutzpah Lounge and was mainly for people to complain about SF admin. actions, it's now so much more than that.
Before we started babbling about useless things, like what kind of non-white mixture is the woman next to Derek in that picture (she looks definitely mixed to me, BTW), we were talking about some serious and important stuff.
I found these to be the most notable posts:
http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=1208361&postcount=4406
http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=1208360&postcount=4405
http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=1208369&postcount=4410
http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=1208412&postcount=4415
http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=1208425&postcount=4421
http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=1208484&postcount=4441
http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=1208488&postcount=4442
http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=1208490&postcount=4443
http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=1208502&postcount=4444
http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=1208507&postcount=4447
So it seems that most people are concluding that it's either the motivation to make money or fear of ZOG power that is the key influence on Don Black and other SF leaders.
Taking into consideration that Black's wife, Chloe, actually donates money to helping non-white children is strange, it seems that what is going on here is not just about making SF more "moderate" (though that's clearly an important thing to note).
I think one could argue that this idea that fear is the primary factor is no more than speculation or feeling. It doesn't seem that we have any definitive evidence that it's mainly about fear.
I found these posts from Gary Yarbrough's wife here (as Defender) to provide extremely interesting information about the Stormfront situation:
Because what Don Black and Stormfront did to Gary Yarbrough, once I get the paperwork from Gary that shows in black and white print that the parole board gave him 15 more years based on Stormfront and Metzger, I am starting an all out war on Stormfront. Gary has known the truth about Stormfront for many years and about how it is all about $$$$$ for Don and that Don knows how much the feds and cops are on his site and does nothing about it...hummm I wonder why? So, stay tuned as soon as I get the paperwork, I will share it here also.
My husband could not post anything because he is in ADMAX prison in Colorado...it is posts that people made about him. I begged Don Black and his people to take those posts down and they did not...I am attaching the link to my blog, which has the notices of action, which name the websites. I contacted everyone one of them. The only ones who gave me problems were Black and Metzger, which Metzger finally took down his posts but probably too late.
Gary has the 15 year notice of action on its way to me...with Stormfront and Metzger named as the reason why and I will have it posted as soon as I get ithttp://susan1219.wordpress.com/2010/10/25/constitutionalright/
The majority over at SF are not real WN...they are troll, antis, cops, and feds....I don't think you want those types over here to make high numbers. As my husband says, "It is quantity over quality"
I know that Black gets a lot of his support from federal informants...and it does not cost near what he says to run the website.
Fred O'Malley
December 15th, 2010, 01:35 PM
I believe Mossad was behind 9/11, I'm about 99% certain of it, however, I don't know how they did it.
I PM'd Jake to ask him to edit his post before Alex saw it and to be more respectful, he declined saying that if Alex is what he says he is, then he wouldn't ban him. I still don't see how Alex could let that one fly.
What don't you understand about how mossad did it? I can fill a lot of those blanks for you.
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 01:35 PM
They might look good but I guarantee neither one of them has the skills to cook or sew, no less run the household, but if that's what you want...then enjoy it.
Training them is half the fun. These days we have to make use of what's left out here in Babylon 2
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 01:46 PM
Hold the press!
We have a new thread
Where the SF members are determined to take on their worst enemy.....
Stormfront fatloss thread of 2011
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t762008/
To paraphrase:
They have met the enemy and it is them
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 01:53 PM
The Old Man just became a senior moderator over at Kelso's White News Now.
http://www.whitenewsnow.com/forums/us-news-white-folks/11324-call-these-10-senators-now-dec-9-2010-stop-dream-act-amnesty.html#post44494
Why? WNN is more restrictive than SF.
My first post there got me a warning even though Kelso himself invited me over there
For simply stating that Sarah Palin is an obvious jewess. It was my last post there.. if I need a mommy to care for me and my defective judgment, then I will choose her myself
notmenomore
December 15th, 2010, 02:01 PM
It doesn't matter that this thread is in the Nutzpah Lounge and was mainly for people to complain about SF admin. actions, it's now so much more than that.
Donnie has been right all along on this point: in Nutzpah it is not possible to derail a thread. Nutzpah specifically allows flaming and general idiocy if thatz where the thread goes. Itz a VNNf cultural thing.
it's now so much more than that.
Yes, there have been several forays into seriousness in this thread that are worthwhile. Nothing wrong with that either.
BUT,
many of those "forays" could have well been their own threads. Keep in mind, when a serious subject or conversation begins in a "thread of different topic" then one shouldn't be surprised if the main gist of the thread returns - to the apparent "derailment" of the serious conversation.
My point?
...to encourage some of these excellent posts and posters to venture out into the forum and start new threads in their appropriate sub-forums. They will be attended as their merit appears. If a subject requires the SF backdrop it will receive in this thread, then so be it; but many subjects touched here can get more considered and serious treatment on their own.
FWIW, BTW, the rest of your post is a good contribution.:)
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 02:08 PM
That I agree with! Also...if they are going to ban someone, just ban them and stop the games. What in the hell is the point of a "ghost ban"?
It's purposeful torture and cowardly insult.. really petty stuff. At least when the clowns hell banned me they really banned me.. they even removed all of my posts
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 02:22 PM
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t763417/
Sugarhitman said:
Really? The Zionists did 911? But why? To attack Iraq and Afghan? But these countries were not immediate threats to Israel..I mean, if the Zionists are going to do 911, why not blame it on their immediate enemies the Palestinians? That way the US could invade "Palestine" take out the PLO and Hamas...Israel's problem solved.
For oil? Israel isnt in the Oil business. So why?
JIDL Tactic #13.. sidetrack the discussion with absurd, illogical doubts, falsehoods and alternate concepts
The thread is less than 2 full pages long even though it's about a week old.. SF really has the membership scared to comment on this.. OR they have finally banned most folks who have eyes to see and ears to hear the truth about 9/11
notmenomore
December 15th, 2010, 02:25 PM
My first post there got me a warning even though Kelso himself invited me over there
For simply stating that Sarah Palin is an obvious jewess. It was my last post there.. if I need a mommy to care for me and my defective judgment, then I will choose her myself
Time will have to tell where Kelso is going to go with his forum and news-site.
I've reviewed some of his comments on the orientation of the site, and to me it's quite clear what he is about. The relative merits and success of such an approach (although certainly arguable at the least) will be clear enough soon. I, for one, can relate to an approach that leads the candidate to the spring and then steps back for them to drink on their own. If someone wants to to expend time and effort on an approach that doesn't name the jew (for example) but takes the participant to a vista from which naming is clearly the only remaining option, then I'm fine with them having a go at it.
Kelso is certainly an interesting activist. If he finds a niche that works then I'm OK with it. I'm sure his ears must burn vigorously as he recalls some of his early posts at SF (as Charles A Lindbergh) and reconciles them with subsequent events. The evisceratiojn of entire lengthy threads (and their later total deletion) resembles nothing so much as the experience Kelso reported from Free Republic when he first arrived at SF. That said, it should be clear to anyone who would post on the WNN (could there be some punning similarity here to another, older website?) that the jew is NOT to named nor the nigger beaten up upon. So do with it what you will. I agree with stonewall and Linder that Kelso has yet to earn our distrust or contempt. He can still do it; he just hasn't yet.
He will, it seems, have to eventually decide what his continuing relationship with the SF admin crowd and Duke will be.
Defender
December 15th, 2010, 02:45 PM
Oops...I was so emotional last night...I meant to say it is quality over quanitity but for Stormfront, it is quanitity over quality.....:) One of these days I will learn not to type when I am super emotional :)
Rae Kiley
December 15th, 2010, 02:53 PM
It doesn't matter that this thread is in the Nutzpah Lounge and was mainly for people to complain about SF admin. actions, it's now so much more than that.
Before we started babbling about useless things, like what kind of non-white mixture is the woman next to Derek in that picture (she looks definitely mixed to me, BTW), we were talking about some serious and important stuff.
I found these to be the most notable posts:
http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=1208361&postcount=4406
http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=1208360&postcount=4405
http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=1208369&postcount=4410
http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=1208412&postcount=4415
http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=1208425&postcount=4421
http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=1208484&postcount=4441
http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=1208488&postcount=4442
http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=1208490&postcount=4443
http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=1208502&postcount=4444
http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=1208507&postcount=4447
So it seems that most people are concluding that it's either the motivation to make money or fear of ZOG power that is the key influence on Don Black and other SF leaders.
Taking into consideration that Black's wife, Chloe, actually donates money to helping non-white children is strange, it seems that what is going on here is not just about making SF more "moderate" (though that's clearly an important thing to note).
I think one could argue that this idea that fear is the primary factor is no more than speculation or feeling. It doesn't seem that we have any definitive evidence that it's mainly about fear.
I found these posts from Gary Yarbrough's wife here (as Defender) to provide extremely interesting information about the Stormfront situation:
I thought that all reference to him had been taken down...But it was too late.
Am I incorrect in thinking this? I remember the post in SM asking for this to be done.
I for one fail to see what it matters if people are talking about him on any internet forum. He is a hero to many in this movement, so it stands to reason that he would be talked about. Fucking feebs!
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 03:05 PM
Statement:
Retort:
This is a direct threat to ban probably the most prolific writer of White Nationalist articles in the country. This is a highly educated man, who, under various nome de plumes, has written more articles that have been published on the net than any WN alive, bar none.
At the very time this threat was made to ban him from Stormfront over a statement about 9/11, he was probably writing most of what appeared in David Duke's newsletter!
When it comes to 9/11, nobody is safe over there.
I agree about White Rights.. the man has never written anything that I did not agree with and he is top flight. We were good friends over there and never clashed, even once
Jack Hammer Head is not fit to polish the man's shoes
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 03:09 PM
Time will have to tell where Kelso is going to go with his forum and news-site.
I've reviewed some of his comments on the orientation of the site, and to me it's quite clear what he is about. The relative merits and success of such an approach (although certainly arguable at the least) will be clear enough soon. I, for one, can relate to an approach that leads the candidate to the spring and then steps back for them to drink on their own. If someone wants to to expend time and effort on an approach that doesn't name the jew (for example) but takes the participant to a vista from which naming is clearly the only remaining option, then I'm fine with them having a go at it.
Kelso is certainly an interesting activist. If he finds a niche that works then I'm OK with it. I'm sure his ears must burn vigorously as he recalls some of his early posts at SF (as Charles A Lindbergh) and reconciles them with subsequent events. The evisceratiojn of entire lengthy threads (and their later total deletion) resembles nothing so much as the experience Kelso reported from Free Republic when he first arrived at SF. That said, it should be clear to anyone who would post on the WNN (could there be some punning similarity here to another, older website?) that the jew is NOT to named nor the nigger beaten up upon. So do with it what you will. I agree with stonewall and Linder that Kelso has yet to earn our distrust or contempt. He can still do it; he just hasn't yet.
He will, it seems, have to eventually decide what his continuing relationship with the SF admin crowd and Duke will be.
My post may have sounded bitter but in truth I like Jamie Kelso and gave him much rep comments at SF. Super moderated forums like his simply do not appeal to me. I wish him the best
Wayne
December 15th, 2010, 03:13 PM
Has MuadDib, ... ever posted any extensive details about the Mossad connection to 9/11? You're off your meds, Sybil. You keep repeating yourself.
Sybil, I moderated Newslinks. I started and stickied the original 9-11 thread at SF. All gone, Sybil, along with all of my posts.
Take your meds.
notmenomore
December 15th, 2010, 03:26 PM
I moderated Newslinks. I started and stickied the original 9-11 thread at SF. All gone, Sybil, along with all of my posts.
Thatz right, Wayne: your posts and everyone else's posts in the entire thread.
Just like the "War in Iraq" Thread. Many, Many super posts, superlative analysis, study of diplomacy, of history, of strategy and tactics... ALL GONE! And why?
I say pettiness, cowardice, corruption, and most of all inadequacy.
Wayne
December 15th, 2010, 03:35 PM
Thatz right, Wayne: your posts and everyone else's posts in the entire thread.
Just like the "War in Iraq" Thread. Many, Many super posts, superlative analysis, study of diplomacy, of history, of strategy and tactics... ALL GONE!That thread was a WN reaction to every event during that "war." Yep, all gone. What a waste. The thread for the second one went the same way.
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 03:58 PM
I believe it was WR14 who said we had to shut down a thread that was analyzing the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, or it was going to be shut down for us. Think we got through the first two, maybe three chapters before that happened. It was years ago.
Good luck over at WNN with Jamie. He seems to be making a 'mainstream' forum too.
I'm down to one forum now. Still researching cancer and it's cures among other things here.
Causal agents and cure
http://www.oxygenhealth.com/
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 04:13 PM
The rules apply to anyone you're calling a jew. If you can prove it's a jew, then call it a jew. If you have only your opinion, then you don't have proof. There is almost nothing more laughable than your typical semi-literate WN moronski cock-positive it can identify jews from photographs. I have no use for those morons, and I don't tolerate their ass-clownage in this forum.
All the stuff you ask is in various threads. I'm German-English-Swiss in descent. I was raised a Christian Scientist, but never personally believed in it. If you have more questions, ask. If you do searches in here, I've written about some of this stuff at length, at least where it touches on our political concerns. My ancestors on both sides were here before the revolution, and both sides had members fighting to liberate us from detestable England.
So were mine, as far back as 1620.. one of my ancestors (with my father's exact name) stood on Lexington Green 1775 and took one for the team
Armstrong
December 15th, 2010, 04:16 PM
So what are you here for Mr. I saved the life of a muslim nigger? You claim your not a WN, so what's the deal?
I'm here to find out who my friends are, and who they aren't.
Why are you saying you're in Georgia, when you're in Las Vegas??
Armstrong
December 15th, 2010, 04:18 PM
Causal agents and cure
http://www.oxygenhealth.com/
We been breathing together today.
Rae Kiley
December 15th, 2010, 04:21 PM
We been breathing together today.
Awww I hope she pulls through this. ((hugs))
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 04:23 PM
Our government is a two-party oligarchy. What is the (viable) alternative?
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/aa/7.62_NATO_tracer_rounds,_in_stripper_clip.JPG
As soon as enough men "discover" what should be swinging between their legs, and as soon as the right window appears. For now education and prepping is all you can do
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 04:27 PM
We been breathing together today.
Get a high grade ozone generator immediately.. if you don't have one. And McCabes book.. amazon.com has it. You both have my prayers
John Liberty
December 15th, 2010, 04:31 PM
Originally Posted by Rob MacGregor
My first post there got me a warning even though Kelso himself invited me over there
For simply stating that Sarah Palin is an obvious jewess. It was my last post there.. if I need a mommy to care for me and my defective judgment, then I will choose her myself
Must have been a neocon forum,
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/static/pictures/resized/136-106/26/26559.jpg
Republican vice presidential candidate Governor Sarah Palin displays an Israel flag in her office window despite the tiny Jewish population in her state. Republicans say "that says it all" concerning what they charge is Democratic propaganda that she once backed Pat Buchanan, whose name is anathema to most Jews.
Heeb source
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/127445
John Liberty
December 15th, 2010, 04:34 PM
Going all out for the heeb vote,
Donnie in Ohio
December 15th, 2010, 04:36 PM
Donnie has been right all along on this point: in Nutzpah it is not possible to derail a thread. Nutzpah specifically allows flaming and general idiocy if thatz where the thread goes. Itz a VNNf cultural thing.
Preach, brother!
I know I have pointed that out at least 6 times in this thread.
There seem to be some quality posters who have recently left SF now posting heer, and I have enjoyed their contributions, both in this thread and in other parts of VNNF.
There are also a few cranks, but they always get sorted out in the end.
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 04:36 PM
Looking at all available data, even kooky predictions, December 21,2012 is looking very much like the battle between good (whites) and evil (jews) and is what the bible calls Armageddon. They also predict that good will be injured but will vanquish evil and throw it into the abyss. (I'm all for that.)
"No man shall know the day and hour"
But it's coming and even some lemming-fools can see it now. As White Nationalists we should all be aware just how far down the rabbit hole we are
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 04:39 PM
Going all out for the heeb vote,
So obvious it hurts..and at scamfront there were clowns saying she was "hot".. T.J.B.
Ann2
December 15th, 2010, 04:52 PM
I'm here to find out who my friends are, and who they aren't.
Why are you saying you're in Georgia, when you're in Las Vegas??
Where did you get the idea I'm in Vegas?:rofl Sorry...Georgia girl through and through.
Fred O'Malley
December 15th, 2010, 04:53 PM
Going all out for the heeb vote,
At least she's got a 'pair to draw to.'
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 04:55 PM
It is better to pray the sinner will repent, rather than be killed.
Depends on who we're talking about
Jews deserve nothing but a woodchipper or flames
Those who serve the demonic yid deserve twice their fate.. because as a famous man once said, they are twice sons of hell (because they are traitors to their own race)
Then there's race mixers.. into the woodchipper also, please
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 04:56 PM
At least she's got a 'pair to draw to.'
Not that I ever want to see more of her, but I'm guessing there's a star of Molech tat hidden on at least one of them
Armstrong
December 15th, 2010, 05:05 PM
Awww I hope she pulls through this. ((hugs))
Thanks, that would be nice. We're hoping what we're seeing is a positive
development.
AussieWN
December 15th, 2010, 05:07 PM
So obvious it hurts..and at scamfront there were clowns saying she was "hot".. T.J.B. On scamfront there are posters saying that anything remotely White looking is hot,threads about is a certain actress or model White tends to bring out the trolls who would have no problem fucking a non White. Although I hate the threads,they do seperate the true WN males from the potential race traitors.
Armstrong
December 15th, 2010, 05:07 PM
Depends on who we're talking about
Jews deserve nothing but a woodchipper or flames
Those who serve the demonic yid deserve twice their fate.. because as a famous man once said, they are twice sons of hell (because they are traitors to their own race)
Then there's race mixers.. into the woodchipper also, please
What would you feel if people were advocating running you though a wood chipper, or the flames??
Fred O'Malley
December 15th, 2010, 05:08 PM
A nice jewish neighborhood.
Thumbnail
http://www.stuffwelike.com/stuffwelike/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/e3conceptart_disapproach1-1024x576.jpg
Blanche de Glace
December 15th, 2010, 05:10 PM
What would you feel if people were advocating running you though a wood chipper, or the flames??
Dr. Phil, is that you?
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 05:10 PM
You just did, but it's cool. Some anonymous crank on the web insinuating I'm Jewish is apparently de rigueur for this thread.
I won't complain to Alex like some others, right Fred? :D
Lots of non jews wear the yarmulke.. and they are twice sons of hell for doing so.. literally 2 x as bad as the jews themselves
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 05:11 PM
What would you feel if people were advocating running you though a wood chipper, or the flames??
First they have to accomplish that. I know that many of my enemies would love to do so and they literally did just as bad to many of my ancestors. Look up the history of Clan MacGregor.. at one time a murderer could get a pardon by bringing in 6 MacGregor heads, children, women, old folks..
No mercy to the ones I listed
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 05:24 PM
There are records of Jews in North America since XVI/XVII century.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_the_United_States
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_history_in_Colonial_America
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_history_in_Texas
Also
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/johnson%27s_hidden_loyalties.htm#Secret%20Ethnicity
http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Issue/story?oid=oid%3A81660
Donnie in Ohio
December 15th, 2010, 05:27 PM
The facial construction, the flat head. and more than that the BEHAVIOR of LBJ tells us that he was a yidfly
You can see all that through the visor in your helmet?
Wayne
December 15th, 2010, 05:27 PM
Dr. Phil, is that you?DrivenSno, is that you?
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 05:28 PM
It doesn't prove that Johnson was a Jew, what is does prove however, is that Jewish women are some ugly fucking bitches. And any guy that fucked Golda Meir was probably a faggot that also would have fucked LBJ.
Seriously, LBJ wasn't a fucking Jew in body, but he was a Jew in mind, as are all JEWDEO-Christians. Look at his parents names Samuel and Rebekah, you can't get any more Jewish than that. JEWDEO-Christians are fucking dupes who follow a Jew religion.
Fixed it for ya
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 05:30 PM
You can see all that through the visor in your helmet?
You're not worth further responses.. really :)
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 05:35 PM
CIs may not be wrapped too tight, but James Wickstrom makes it clear that they hate jews. That makes them our allies.
This has some religious stuff at the opening, but make no mistake, this is a jewish hit piece.
(SECOND VIDEO)
James Wickstrom - Racial Identy (http://doctorjamespwickstrom.blogspot.com/)
Wickstrom is not our best representative. He's sincere and well studied but inarticulate. Try these guys.. from current events, scholarly study of true history to some good laughs.. and yes we see jews as the ultimate evil on this planet
http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=31407&cmd=tc
http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=30258&cmd=tc
http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=21924&cmd=tc
Donnie in Ohio
December 15th, 2010, 05:40 PM
You're not worth further responses.. really :)
Then thou must stay thy hand from quoting my posts, goodly Sir Knight.
Blanche de Glace
December 15th, 2010, 05:40 PM
DrivenSno, is that you?
No, I'm not DrivenSno.
Fred O'Malley
December 15th, 2010, 05:58 PM
My mental image of Sarah Palin.
http://www.epilogue.net/cgi/database/art/view.pl?id=87078
Rae Kiley
December 15th, 2010, 05:59 PM
Going all out for the heeb vote,
lol Obvious make over....She does not have boobs like that.
Simo Häyhä
December 15th, 2010, 06:01 PM
What would you feel if people were advocating running you though a wood chipper, or the flames??
That's too bad, because I'd estimate that half of the world wants to do that to US!
Nothing would please the hordes of self-righteous Shabbat Goyim more than seeing "racists", "anti-semites", "homophobes" and whatnot burning and being shredded into pieces, all that to please their jewish puppeeters; just like the "useful idiots" they are (a term which is used by the kikes THEMSELVES to describe such people).
Fred O'Malley
December 15th, 2010, 06:08 PM
lol Obvious make over....She does not have boobs like that.
Maybe she does now. ;)
Presidential run, you know?
FL Patriot
December 15th, 2010, 06:10 PM
Time will have to tell where Kelso is going to go with his forum and news-site.
I've reviewed some of his comments on the orientation of the site, and to me it's quite clear what he is about. The relative merits and success of such an approach (although certainly arguable at the least) will be clear enough soon. I, for one, can relate to an approach that leads the candidate to the spring and then steps back for them to drink on their own. If someone wants to to expend time and effort on an approach that doesn't name the jew (for example) but takes the participant to a vista from which naming is clearly the only remaining option, then I'm fine with them having a go at it.
Kelso is certainly an interesting activist. If he finds a niche that works then I'm OK with it. I'm sure his ears must burn vigorously as he recalls some of his early posts at SF (as Charles A Lindbergh) and reconciles them with subsequent events. The evisceratiojn of entire lengthy threads (and their later total deletion) resembles nothing so much as the experience Kelso reported from Free Republic when he first arrived at SF. That said, it should be clear to anyone who would post on the WNN (could there be some punning similarity here to another, older website?) that the jew is NOT to named nor the nigger beaten up upon. So do with it what you will. I agree with stonewall and Linder that Kelso has yet to earn our distrust or contempt. He can still do it; he just hasn't yet.
He will, it seems, have to eventually decide what his continuing relationship with the SF admin crowd and Duke will be.
I don't know, you tell me. One thing I can say, "I have missed the mist man!" He was one of the first people that befriended me on Stormfront and it is my heartfelt belief that he is what every man looks for in a friend. I tried to look for him when he left, but here he is, doing battle against Zog. I for one appreciate Alex allowing me to post on this site and have enjoyed a lot of the pillow fighting.
We may not all agree on what is the best strategy but it is my belief that we all care about our people. It is good to see old friends in here. I think the web has plenty of room for VNN and other WN sites. Both serve an important part in trying to wake up our people.
May your God look kindly on all of us.
Your servant,
FL Patriot
Pat Healey
December 15th, 2010, 06:24 PM
Jews and Jew Lovers: don't cry when you read this...........just die.
Was Eisenhower a Jew?
Or did he just act like one?
http://www.coffinman.co.uk/eisenhower_had_jewish_blood_files/image027.jpg
The question of whether Eisenhower was Jewish or not is probably not as important as how he became a General and the actions he took.
Among other notable actions that Eisenhower was responsible for were actions such as:
The massacre of surrendered Germans at Dachau,
http://www.scrapbookpages.com/DachauMemorial/Liberation05.jpg
http://www.scrapbookpages.com/Dachauscrapbook/DachauPhotos/OldPhotos/DachauMassacre.jpg
http://www.scrapbookpages.com/Dachauscrapbook/DachauPhotos/OldPhotos/DeadSS.jpg
The fire bombing of Dresden,
http://www.cityofsound.com/photos/uncategorized/2007/10/29/dresden_aftermath.jpg
http://www.warantiques.com/images/360_german_ar_hamboy.jpg
http://timewitnesses.org/images/dresden.jpg
http://www.subvertednation.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/dresden-pile-of-bodies.jpg
Operation Keelhaul, and
The intentional starvation of over 1,250,000 "disarmed enemy forces"
http://www.coffinman.co.uk/eisenhower_had_jewish_blood_files/image004.jpg
These actions alone clearly mark him as a war criminal and an embarrassment. But was he a Jew?
Eisenhower Is A derivative Of Eisenhauer: A Jewish Name
http://www.coffinman.co.uk/eisenhower_had_jewish_blood_files/image017.jpg
http://www.coffinman.co.uk/eisenhower_had_jewish_blood_files/image015.jpg
Now, I'm not saying Eisenhower was definitively a Jew. But he had a Jewish name and he did some pretty terrible things to White Germans. Didn't he?
Operation Keelhaul
Eisenhower was responsible for " Operation Keelhaul " - where allied forces rounded over two million anti-Communists who escaped Stalin and tuned them over to Russian forces.
Part of the Yalta Agreement between the Big Three — Stalin, Roosevelt, and Churchill involved the repatriation of Russians to their respective homelands where they were either immediately executed or sent to die in the Gulag.
Eisenhower did that? Yeah.
http://www.coffinman.co.uk/eisenhower_had_jewish_blood_files/image007.jpg
I never said that it was definite that Eisenhower was a Jew - but his West Point yearbook (The Howitzer) named his as "The Terrible Swedish Jew".
http://www.coffinman.co.uk/eisenhower_had_jewish_blood_files/image011.jpg
West Point was very conscious of any ' Non-White' candidates. It was obvious from Eisenhower's appearance that he was carrying another race's blood. The headmaster quizzed him and he admitted he had Jewish ancestors.
http://www.coffinman.co.uk/eisenhower_had_jewish_blood_files/image019.jpg
Now, I'm not saying that Eisenhower was definitely a Jew. But his father was a Swedish Jew who married a Swedish gentile woman. He had a Jewish name...and he did some pretty despicable things to White Germans.
Eisenhower Was Considered Incompetent
During World War II when Col. Eisenhower was working for Gen. Douglas McArthur in the South Pacific, McArthur protested to his superiors in Washington (DC) that Eisenhower was incompetent and that he did not want Eisenhower on his staff.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_xHxPbqohqSc/SdZYGxK4FdI/AAAAAAAABfg/AzYG6_YirLg/s400/General+MacArthur+armytimes.com
McArthur Viewed Eisenhower as Incompetent
Col. to 5 Star General in One Easy Step
In 1943, Washington not only transferred Col. Eisenhower to Europe but promoted him over more than 30 more experienced senior officers to five star general and placed him in charge of all the US forces in Europe. Eisenhower went from a Colonel directly to a 5 Star General? How did that happen? Jewish Magic?
Jew Bernard Baruch was Instrumental in Eisenhower's Advancement
Eisenhower’s military promotions on the eve of WWII and during the war are curious to say the least. Zionists found an Army officer who had been a military failure until Bernard Baruch promoted him to General.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c6/Winston_Churchill_and_Bernard_Baruch_talk_in_car_in_front_of_Baruch%27s_home,_14_April_1961.jpg
Eisenhower's actions and responsibilities during and after the war are quite strange as well. Eisenhower had direct, personal negotiations with Stalin on the placements of the armies and the surrender of territory won by American forces - giving them to the Russians.
Now, I'm not saying that it's definite that Eisenhower was a Jew. But Eisenhower's nickname at West Point was "The Terrible Swedish Jew", his father was a Jew, he had a Jewish last name, his advancement in the military was pushed by a rich Jewish financier, and he did some pretty despicable things to White Germans.
But Was He a Jew?
Look, I'm not saying that Eisenhower was definitely a Jew. But Eisenhower's nickname at West Point was "The Terrible Swedish Jew", his father was a Jew, he had a Jewish last name, his advancement in the military was pushed by a rich Jewish financier, and he did some pretty despicable things to White Germans.
And in 1952, although he had been a Democrat most of his life, the Jew Baruch endorsed Dwight D. Eisenhower for president.
Listen, I'm not saying that I'm absolutely positive that Eisenhower was a Jew. And I'm not saying that people who try to argue that he wasn't a Jew are horribly uninformed or making "Jewish Guesses*" about Eisenhower's Jewishness.
I'm just saying that you need to look at the facts.
-----------------------------------------------------------
* Jewish Guess
–verb (used with object)
1.
to intentionally commit oneself to an opinion about (something) in direct opposition to existing irrefutable evidence supporting another conclusion or opinion to purposely mislead: I tried to throw them off with Jewish Guesses about specific aspects of 9/11.
2.
to intentionally estimate or conjecture about incorrectly: to make a Jewish Guess about the cause of the heat at WTC 1 &2.
3.
to pretend to think, believe, or suppose that something that is not true is true especially in support of Jewish Lies: I'll continue to make Jewish Guesses about 9/11 until I'm brought to Justice.
–verb (used without object)
4.
to intentionally form a false estimate or conjecture (often fol. by at or about ): A Jewish Guess is the same as an intentional lie.
5.
to intentionally estimate or conjecture incorrectly.
–noun
6.
an opinion that one reaches or to which one commits oneself with the intent to confuse issues and waste resources in defense of crimes committed by Jews and/or in support of the Jewish Nation especially in the presence of overwhelming evidence suggesting Jewish guilt.
7.
the act of intentionally forming such a false, misleading opinion: to take a Jewish Guess at what caused Building 7 to fall.
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 06:24 PM
If anyone tried to read this thread from scratch, the importance of it would probably be lost in between the 4 or so derailments inside. The main topic is (was?) about those of us who have witnessed the alarming developments at SF which pointed to something much more sinister and dangerous then a mere disagreement of approach.
Since then, so much confusion has poisoned the central discussion who knows if it can recover at this point.
Which was/is the intent of the derailers. I've run out of troll biscuits, myself :nigmelon:
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 06:27 PM
That's too bad, because I'd estimate that half of the world wants to do that to US!
Nothing would please the hordes of self-righteous Shabbat Goyim more than seeing "racists", "anti-semites", "homophobes" and whatnot burning and being shredded into pieces, all that to please their jewish puppeeters; just like the "useful idiots" they are (a term which is used by the kikes THEMSELVES to describe such people).
How many useful idiots thought the super-violent, vicious jewish garbage movie "Inglorious Basterds" was funny, cool, with-it?
Pat Healey
December 15th, 2010, 06:29 PM
Which was/is the intent of the derailers. I've run out of troll biscuits, myself :nigmelon:
It's still a good source of material.
Go thru it and grab something, make a new thread on that subject if you think it's worthy.
It's ok.
Fred O'Malley
December 15th, 2010, 06:49 PM
Jewish descent
Churchill-Roosevelt-Eisenhower-Stalin
Pat Healey
December 15th, 2010, 06:57 PM
Jewish descent
Churchill-Roosevelt-Eisenhower-Stalin
I'm sure the shitheadfromohio would probably like to circlejerk over whether or not they were jews..............LOL
Simo Häyhä
December 15th, 2010, 07:55 PM
Jewish descent
Stalin
I don't know wether Stalin was a jew or not; this rumor came forth thanks to the fact that his surname (Djyugalivitchi, or something like that) means "son of a jewess" in georgian. But I think that's been disproven, if I'm not mistaken.
Whatever the case, jewish or not, he was certainly not Aryan (he came from Transcaucasia, after all), and the shit that he ordered done to germans by his troops is enough to make him worst than any average hook-nosed, side-lock-sporting, yarmulke-wearing kike out there.
http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/4666/art048.gif (http://img98.imageshack.us/i/art048.gif/)
This image was taken from the website of a german artist, but it was actually a RECRUITING POSTER for the Soviet Union; it depicts mongoloid animals, from the eastern provinces of Russia, raping blonde blue eyed german women. This sort of thing happened DAILY in Germany when the red animals invaded.
Celtic_Patriot
December 15th, 2010, 07:55 PM
You're off your meds, Sybil. You keep repeating yourself.
Sybil, I moderated Newslinks. I started and stickied the original 9-11 thread at SF. All gone, Sybil, along with all of my posts.
Take your meds.
Take your meds.
http://i1101.photobucket.com/albums/g423/sent_1/MuadDibcallsBehelitSybil.png
Wayne calls Greek posters "Sybil". The fantasy World of Wayne.
Everybody can see that Wayne has not posted any 9/11 data in this thread. Nor did he at Stormfront. He is a sycophant of Don Black, even after Don Black banned all his multiple handles on SF.
.
N. Wolf
December 15th, 2010, 08:18 PM
Jewish descent
Churchill-Roosevelt-Eisenhower-Stalin
I was bothered by the fact that "Donnie from Ohio" so strongly insisted that certain corrupt and destructive people were not Jews without any evidence to back himself up. But this issue needs to be cleared up, since we can't claim someone is a Jew when there's no proof for it.
- Eisenhower was undoubtably of Jewish descent. While I was fully aware of that from past research, I don't think I need to give any links considering Pat Healy's recent post.
- Stalin was actually not Jewish (though he was married to a Jewess), just read this article:
http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot.com/2009/02/was-josef-stalin-jewish.html
- Churchill was also not Jewish (just ignore the fact that the author of the article is an enemy):
http://www.gnxp.com/blog/2007/04/churchills-jewish-ancestry-not_08.php
We only have some speculation as to whether his mother was of Jewish descent or not, but I found no evidence for it. As for Moshe Kohn, considering the larger quote from him there, it really does look like he was being sarcastic (even if he wasn't, it's not as if he provides sources or anything).
It seems that before he became completely corrupt, Churchill wrote this (something I don't think a Jew would write): http://library.flawlesslogic.com/ish.htm
Of course, there's no actual conflict between the Zionists and Bolsheviks, they're almost the same thing, but that's beside the point.
- Roosevelt wasn't Jewish either (he's probably the most controversial). This is basically all the evidence you can find to support the claims that he's Jewish:
http://www.ety.com/HRP/rev/fdr.htm
It seems like a real case, but it's not that much if you break it down and ignore the irrelevent statements.
Well, actually he had this ancestor named Claes Martenszen van Rosenvelt who may have been Jewish, but that's his great-great...great grandfather (from the 1600s). That, resulting in his being 1/128th Jewish, doesn't give him enough Jewish blood for anyone to consider him biologically Jewish. It's unlikely that the line from there on married a series of Marrano Jews. I certainly don't have access to the resources I'd need to prove that, but only if it could be shown would we be able to say he had substantial Jewish blood.
Often people say that the Delano side was a Spanish or Italian Jewish family, but it was actually originally "de Lannoy" (the name was later changed to Delano), a French Flemish family that doesn't seem to have been Jewish at all. The progenitor it's traced back to is Phillipe de Lannoy, a pilgrim who went to Massachussetts in the early 1600s.
Although Roosevelt was clearly what you might call a manufactured Jew, since many Jews considered him one of their own and he was married to a Jewess.
Now, before Donnie comes back here and derails this thread completely, lets not make statements about Jewish descent without serious evidence.
Celtic_Patriot
December 15th, 2010, 08:32 PM
No, I'm not DrivenSno.
Wayne thought Fionn of PAA was An Faolchú Fionn on Stormfront.
More from Wayne's World.
http://i1101.photobucket.com/albums/g423/sent_1/WayneMuadDibFionnPAAScreenshot.gif
An Faolchú Fionn on Stormfront, who Wayne links to: http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showpost.php?p=4282405&postcount=110 is a different person. Wayne's gone insane, he's biting everything, like a rabid dog.
Wayne thinks he is a spy. He's an amateur. A simple fantasy world, it's Wayne's World. He equates Don Black risking his life putting a Nigger in charge of Dominica with Rockwell sitting next to Malcolm X in an auditorium.
The hilarious part is 114,000 people now know Wayne lives in a fantasy world and has a track record of proven false claims.
Yet Wayne has yet to make a single post with data relevant to the 9/11 issue being done by Jews.
Wayne you've been exposed to be a sycophant of Don Black, Operation Red Dog, and a fraud who has no mind. Your idea of activism was laying around the pool in 2005 and shaking a few hands.
.
Pat Healey
December 15th, 2010, 08:39 PM
I was bothered by the fact that "Donnie from Ohio" so strongly insisted that certain corrupt and destructive people were not Jews without any evidence to back himself up. But this issue needs to be cleared up, since we can't claim someone is a Jew when there's no proof for it.
- Eisenhower was undoubtably of Jewish descent. While I was fully aware of that from past research, I don't think I need to give any links considering Pat Healy's recent post.
- Stalin was actually not Jewish (though he was married to a Jewess), just read this article:
http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot.com/2009/02/was-josef-stalin-jewish.html
- Churchill was also not Jewish (just ignore the fact that the author of the article is an enemy):
http://www.gnxp.com/blog/2007/04/churchills-jewish-ancestry-not_08.php
We only have some speculation as to whether his mother was of Jewish descent or not, but I found no evidence for it. As for Moshe Kohn, considering the larger quote from him there, it really does look like he was being sarcastic (even if he wasn't, it's not as if he provides sources or anything).
It seems that before he became completely corrupt, Churchill wrote this (something I don't think a Jew would write): http://library.flawlesslogic.com/ish.htm
Of course, there's no actual conflict between the Zionists and Bolsheviks, they're almost the same thing, but that's beside the point.
- Roosevelt wasn't Jewish either (he's probably the most controversial). This is basically all the evidence you can find to support the claims that he's Jewish:
http://www.ety.com/HRP/rev/fdr.htm
It seems like a real case, but it's not that much if you break it down and ignore the irrelevent statements.
Well, actually he had this ancestor named Claes Martenszen van Rosenvelt who may have been Jewish, but that's his 128th great grandfather (from the 1600s). But that doesn't give him enough Jewish blood for anyone to consider him biologically Jewish. It's unlikely that the line from there on married a series of Marrano Jews. I certainly don't have access to the resources I'd need to prove that, but if it could be shown
Often people say that the Delano side was a Spanish or Italian Jewish family, but it was actually originally "de Lannoy" (the name was later changed to Delano), a French Flemish family that doesn't seem to have been Jewish at all. The progenitor it's traced back to is Phillipe de Lannoy, a pilgrim who went to Massachussetts in the early 1600s.
Although Roosevelt was clearly what you might call a manufactured Jew, since many Jews considered him one of their own and he was married to a Jewess.
Now, before Donnie comes back here and derails this thread completely, lets not make statements about Jewish descent without serious evidence.
I agree with you.
Very strange indeed about that person from Ohio.
Quite honestly, the things that were done to our people at the hands of the Jews and their "helpers" is beyond disturbing. How anyone can attempt to blunt their terrible crimes by posting what amounts to "Jewish Guesses" concerning just how "Jewish" they were...is simply sick.
As with Eisenhower, it is quite obvious who his benefactor was and what his motives were. Those are the central issues.
Know your enemy.
PeterCorde
December 15th, 2010, 08:45 PM
DrivenSno, is that you?
Hers starts with W.
DrivenSnow introduced herself here:
http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=1205481&postcount=43
ray bateson
December 15th, 2010, 09:01 PM
Republican vice presidential candidate Governor Sarah Palin displays an Israel flag in her office window despite the tiny Jewish population in her state.
Tiny? Yeah, tiny like the biggest players in state/local business and government, like anywhere you find kikes. So what's the point?
Fred O'Malley
December 15th, 2010, 09:07 PM
I don't think we can ever know for certain what a long dead person's true ancestry actually was. The reason jews trace the maternal bloodline, is because a man can never know for certain that he is the father of a child, but there is no questioning the female side of it.
Anyway, for what it's worth, I found these articles.
2. Roosevelt's Jewish Ancestry. Even a hasty perusal of the genealogy chart as produced by the Carnegie Institution of Washington, D.C., under direction of Dr. H.H. Laughlin, per asso. press Dispatch March 7, 1934, in the Daily Citizen of Tucson, Arizona, a similar chart was published by the Washington, D.C., Star, of February 29, 1936. Even a hasty perusal of the document convinces one as to President Roosevelt's Jewish ancestry.
t-50781.html
Lenin himself was of mostly Russian and Kalmuck ancestry, but he was also one-quarter Jewish. His maternal grandfather, Israel (Alexander) Blank, was a Ukrainian Jew who was later baptized into the Russian Orthodox Church.7
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v14/v14n1p-4_Weber.html
Churchill's mother was Jenny Jerome. Her father was involved in theatre investment and changed his name from Jacobson to Jerome.
‘Cunning, no doubt, came to Churchill in the Jewish genes transmitted by his mother Lady Randolph Churchill , née Jenny Jacobson/Jerome.’ Moshe Kohn, Jerusalem Post
http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-leaders-churchill-jewish-mother.html
Churchill's "Jewish mother"
http://www.fpp.co.uk/History/antisemitism/ChurchillonJews_6.html
There was increasing suspicion that Stalin himself was Jewish. He had always been considered a Semitic-Mongoloid mixture, perhaps non-Jewish. MANY JEWS, HOWEVER, BELIEVED HIM TO BE ONE OF THEM, and a columnist in the Los Angeles B'nai B'rith Messenger, March 3, 1950, col. 2, p. 5 wrote: "A FORMER SOVIET GENERAL CLAIMS THAT JOSEPH STALIN ES OF JEWISH ANCESTRY."
MANY WHITE RUSSIANS WHO FLED THE BOLSHEVIKI SAY STALIN WAS A JEW. ONE, A CAPTAIN IN THE CZAR ’ S ARMIES, STATED THAT HE KNEW STALIN IN THEIR BOYHOOD AND THAT STALIN ’ S FATHER (DZHUGASHVILI) WAS “ A JEWISH COBBLER. ”
http://www.israelect.com/reference/WillieMartin/StalinTheJew.htm
ray bateson
December 15th, 2010, 09:22 PM
Thank you Blanche for helping to build this thread beyond 111,000 views.
I'd guess that 95% of the viewcount is between all of you people. Those are definitely not unique hits. And may varg correct me, but every transition between pages counts as another hit, when the page is reloaded after each post, after each repping, reply, aborted reply, etc..
Viewcount is meaningless unless only unique hits are recorded.
Big fat nothing.
http://white-pride.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/model4_couple.jpg
http://img526.imageshack.us/img526/2661/gflxs.jpg
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 09:25 PM
That was uncalled for, I don't see how his post warranted such a response from you.
IMO Jake Heke was totally in line for his comments. I'm trying to catch up after being MIA for a week so I don't know what has happened since
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 09:43 PM
According to the New York Times, most people don't believe the official ZOG Federal government story, which is that "Arabs" did 9/11.
Credibility, what facts people decide are credible and valid.
As Suepeace of SF says it should be in Theology, because the Jews want to make 9/11 a religion of terror.
There are other polls in Australia showing 75% don't believe in the "Arabs" story.
.
This is extremely good news. I have watched this situation carefully since 9/11, knowing from minute 5 that it was a Mossad false flag op.. awareness of the truth has spread exponentially since then. Soon only the congregation of "pastor" Hagee and Obongo's Portugese Water Dog will be true believers
Armstrong
December 15th, 2010, 09:44 PM
Dr. Phil, is that you?
No, more a Carl Rogers kind of person, though I used all therapeutic modalities
when it seems appropriate.
PeterCorde
December 15th, 2010, 09:44 PM
Best posts in the thread:
I did that for years when I was a mod. DB knows and obviously, he is satisfied with JJT.
His excuse for demoderating me was that I was deleting threads. After I showed him that he was wrong, I was still demoderated. He'll use any excuse to pretend he was justified. Just like Boot will invent a lie to attempt to justify his actions.
Yes indeed. JJT is by no means or stretch a WN. Decisive argument.
According to the legend he works full time for a Kent based "computer company" that allows him from his home all day up into the night, and really early mornings in England, to be on Stormfront.
I do not intend to be a regular poster here or in any other internet forum. Time is too short for that. But I will take the time to comment on my recent forced exile from Black/Boot-land.
I wanted to leave quietly, as I told Smoky and a few others before I was Jack-booted out. I wished to avoid the unpleasantness that always accompanies a jack-booting. I remember the many vicious lies he told about Wayne after Wayne was no longer able to defend himself, and I expected nothing less for me. He didn’t call me a drunk like he did Wayne(Pot-kettle?), opting instead to use the one epithet he knows hits the hardest with an Appalachian Scotch-Irish White man. He simply called me a liar. Of course he will never do that to my face.
I will not come here and return tit for tat. I have no personal grudge against them, except for the coward who called me a liar. My differences are political.
Youngsters need to learn the old art of “Following the money.” In judaized America that sometimes requires looking beneath the surface. On the surface one would think that Black/Boot would go to great lengths to keep a donor of thousands of dollars in harness. Not so. Witness the alacrity with which they traded a long-time WN poster and very large donor for a judeophilic 90-day wonder who wouldn’t even give them 50 bucks.
It is not the money from SMs, or even Lifetimers that keeps the Black/Boot project afloat. If it were, then they surely would not trade a poster who has given them several thousand dollars for one that wouldn’t even get up off one US Grant to become a SM. Especially when the latter is either so obtuse, or so Yiddish as to say that a White man has more freedom of speech in Zogland today than he had in Hitler’s Germany.
They have a couple of dozen “Lifetimers” now. It requires a donation of $1,000 to become LT. One might think that this increase in $1K donors is really important to the SF regime, but I remind you that the Alpine ski voyage of the non-working adult son pre-dates the surge in “Lifers.”
The only important result of the increased dollar take on SF is to deprive other worthy entities of that support, such as the “Free Edgar Steele” effort.
I have known I was a short-timer for several months---ever since the Edgar Steele thread was trashed by mikhaelis and his megaphone cohort, and finally closed. The only reason for closing a thread that was supporting a real White warrior, who had carried the battle for our side through the heat of the day, was to keep the “Free Edgar Steele” campaign from siphoning off some of the Zogbucks that flow to West Palm.
Again, I will not join the chorus of posters here who dedicate much of their time to bashing the Black/Boot “Project.” Time, and their own mendacity will take care of them. I will use the time I have left to try to accomplish more worthy goals, such as freeing Edgar Steele.
I do not intend to discuss this any further, either here or anywhere else on the internet. I don't even intend to answer the many filthy lies that Boot will tell about me going forward. Based on his track record, you can bet that he will answer each complaint from a Stormfront "Oldman supporter" with another lying personal insult. As long as it is on an anonymous message board, it is of no real import. As I said, he would never do it to my face.
If someone responds to this post and does not see a retort from me, I hope it will not be taken personally. I do not intend to involve myself in a pissing contest with people who have so often recently proven themselves to be skunks. Let the stench stay over there.
PS: My frequent addition of 3 simple words to my posts probably had as much to do with it as anything else. Those words were “I miss MuadDib.”
Yep. Granted, this site is far from flying when you click. But that's not because we haven't (by we I mean Varg) tweaked it wherever possible, and because we have 30 posts to a page. I'm not unhappy with the speed, but certainly if our average use rate jumped that much we'd have to go to a stronger server, and that would increase costs.
I can't answer that; all I can tell you that VNN used to be hosted on a similar setup to the one you describe. That is, someone was hosting it out of his house, ie had physical possession of the computer(s) used as the server and rented a T-1. VNN site(s) were not the only ones this person was hosting. This person paid $500/month for the T-1 line.
I said flat out that Hal Turner was lying about his server costs. I won't assert that about Don Black because I don't know it for a fact. In my opinion, which I will give you, his claims fall somewhere between exaggeration and lying. Of course, I'm biased, as Black has libeled VNN multiple times over the years. I look down on him, ie, I see him for what he is - a low-rent shitbag. His claims and behavior are par for his ilk.
Fred O'Malley
December 15th, 2010, 09:55 PM
This is extremely good news. I have watched this situation carefully since 9/11, knowing from minute 5 that it was a Mossad false flag op.. awareness of the truth has spread exponentially since then. Soon only the congregation of "pastor" Hagee and Obongo's Portugese Water Dog will be true believers
I don't know if you've seen this one.
The Jews are Done Dealin'
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 09:56 PM
Most people don't know how the "law" works.
You do though.
Most people don't know that the actions of an administrative agency have the force and effect of "law". That when dealing with an "agency" all "administrative remedies" must be sought first.
Bottom line: you don't want to become entangled in "The System". "The System" can and will swallow you up.
I think you have unearthed enough information to lead a reasonable person to conclude that David Duke is not who and what he wants you to believe he is. In fact, I suggest we start a specific "David Duke" thread - and summarily dissect him.
I think there is evidence that David Duke is a tool of the enemy. Remember, as Lenin himself said: "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it".
I submit that David Duke may be working directly with the enemy to try to channel and direct the more "Jew-Wise" elements of White America. While, people like Rush Limbaugh work with the enemy to channel and direct the less aware American.
What can the enemy hope to gain through David Duke? At the very least, a list of names of people to arrest when the time comes. Maybe more.
Duke's close association with Black cannot be ignored.
I think the issue is worth a reasoned examination.
This provides a little clearer picture of what we are up against.
Divide and Conquer? You may indeed be onto something. I've noticed the new "touchier, gentler, nicer" Duke lately. I can provide hearsay evidence from an older clansman who was there in the old days.. now this is just heresay but he told me that the Klan was utterly infiltrated and that Duke was on the FBI payroll. He warned me not to join
I am not saying it's true but this fellow was for real, a genuine Southern Klansman
Armstrong
December 15th, 2010, 09:57 PM
Causal agents and cure
http://www.oxygenhealth.com/
That Rob, it's a bit too late for that. But thanks my friend. Thanks!!
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 09:59 PM
I don't know if you've seen this one.
The Jews are Done Dealin' (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLTeQQsd_Bo&feature=player_embedded)
Yes I have, and it's exciting to see that we have some somewhat loyal men in uniform. We can forgive them if they do their sworn duty now
Hell I have not officially "sworn" it but I'm ready to assist
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 10:00 PM
That Rob, it's a bit too late for that. But thanks my friend. Thanks!!
I've heard that people who cut out all dairy and get on the ozone can sometimes be saved up to the last few days. Either way I wish you both the best
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 10:05 PM
The facts are so overwhelmingly on our side that I just can't understand folks reaching into some parallel world for ammo to use against the jews. We can make our entire case, using their OWN words, just as Duke does in his books, yet we see posted all over the net the spurious "Ben Franklin to the Constitutional Convention" quote.
I am 100% convinced that the Ben Franklin quote is jewish in origin. It has the little twists in it that titillate the Levantine mind. Picture in your mind a meeting of the Elders of Zion, where we hear the following:
The Rebbe: "Let's come up with something that we can hand out to the net-nazis that is so outrageous that every time they post it on one of their chat boards, any educated person will think they are nuts."
Ever heard of the Learned Protocols of the Elders of Zion? It has all come to pass, regardless of WHO penned it
How is this "quote" different? Whether accurately attributed to Ben Franklin or not, it has come to pass. I call that prophecy fulfilled
N. Wolf
December 15th, 2010, 10:06 PM
t-50781.html
That's what I was referring to when I mentioned Claes Martenszen van Rosenvelt. In fact, Roosevelt himself mentions this person as his probable Jewish ancestor. But like I said, it's his great-great-(etc.) grandfather from the 1600s, meaning that it's so little Jewish blood after mixing with Gentiles for many generations beyond that (1/128th Jewish). That is, of course, if all those further marriages were not with Marrano Jews that we're not aware (but I said I don't have access to the resources I'd need to find that out, though I think it would have been found easily considering that Jews prefer to think of him as one of their own).
I also explained the Delano family line issue too (it's not a Spanish Jewish family line, as many speculate, but a Flemish line from which the name was changed).
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v14/v14n1p-4_Weber.html
Yes, Lenin was clearly a Jew, quarter-Jewish in descent, and that's where his loyalties lay.
http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-leaders-churchill-jewish-mother.html
Churchill's "Jewish mother"
http://www.fpp.co.uk/History/antisemitism/ChurchillonJews_6.html
But there's the problem, Moshe Kohn's statement is the only real source. The statement was sarcastic and it doesn't have any backing either way. We only have speculation about Churchill's mother, but no actual evidence for her Jewishness.
http://www.israelect.com/reference/WillieMartin/StalinTheJew.htm
The basis for that is the idea that Dzujashvili translates as "Jewison" or "Son of a Jew" from Georgian. But the fact is, it doesn't have the Georgian word for Jew in it at all. Just play around with an online translator that includes Georgian and you could see that.
But all the issues of Stalin's possible Jewish ancestry are addressed in the article I gave:
http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot.com/2009/02/was-josef-stalin-jewish.html
Seriously, read it, it clears up the whole thing very well.
This, of course, does not mean that the USSR wasn't heavily controlled by Jews during Stalin's rule. He had friendships and associations with many Soviet Jews in powerful positions. His killing of certain Jews only reveals in-group fighting within the Soviet government (you could learn this from many sources like Which Way Western Man? by William Simpson).
Fred O'Malley
December 15th, 2010, 10:07 PM
Divide and Conquer? You may indeed be onto something. I've noticed the new "touchier, gentler, nicer" Duke lately. I can provide hearsay evidence from an older clansman who was there in the old days.. now this is just heresay but he told me that the Klan was utterly infiltrated and that Duke was on the FBI payroll. He warned me not to join
I am not saying it's true but this fellow was for real, a genuine Southern Klansman
I knew David Duke way back when we were living in Kenner, La.
I had a strange feeling back then, but I still supported him in politics.
Duke has had a very long career being a thorn in ZOG's side. Many with far lower profiles has gone to the big house. I have my suspicions, but I'll leave it at that.
Those suspicions, coupled with rumors I've heard, give rise to DB's association with Duke. This new wave of BS out of SF has the hairs on the back of my neck standing up.
I can't prove anything at all, but my bullshit detector is pegging the wall.
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 10:10 PM
I can see the Sustaining Membership thread at Stormfront now, with Sugar Britches going hysterical about the "unmentionable filth" that is being posted on VNN nutz lounge. Boot: "Well what did they say?"; Sugar Britches: "I can't even repeat it. Talking about Derek Black and Mexican Pussy."
.
The funny animated GIF that Fred posted put matters over the top :D
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 10:12 PM
I knew David Duke way back when we were living in Kenner, La.
I had a strange feeling back then, but I still supported him in politics.
Duke has had a very long career being a thorn in ZOG's side. Many with far lower profiles has gone to the big house. I have my suspicions, but I'll leave it at that.
Those suspicions, coupled with rumors I've heard, give rise to DB's association with Duke. This new wave of BS out of SF has the hairs on the back of my neck standing up.
I can't prove anything at all, but my bullshit detector is pegging the wall.
I've been saved many times listening to that tiny, quiet warning voice..
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 10:14 PM
Redheads don't tan. Mexicans are 5 ft tall.
,
I'm originally from The SW.. it's creepy but there are hybrid mestizas who have red hair.. (gag)
Fred O'Malley
December 15th, 2010, 10:17 PM
The funny animated GIF that Fred posted put matters over the top :D
THERE'S A PARTY AT SHAMEFRONT
http://i605.photobucket.com/albums/tt139/ZioSlayer/wtufdd.gif
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 10:18 PM
Yes I have read through the thread.
No, I'm not on the payroll.
As for the rest, I have my thoughts on the matter & respect others' right to theirs. I agree with some points & disagree with others.
I've always been more of a reader than a poster.
Well my dear, being mostly a lurker you have taken the cake and have stepped right into it
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 10:19 PM
THERE'S A PARTY AT SHAMEFRONT
http://i605.photobucket.com/albums/tt139/ZioSlayer/wtufdd.gif
I can dance, I can dance, I can dance :D :troll :D
Armstrong
December 15th, 2010, 10:20 PM
I've heard that people who cut out all dairy and get on the ozone can sometimes be saved up to the last few days. Either way I wish you both the best
She passed somewhere around 4:26 this afternoon while being held in my arms. Thanks for all your well wishes.
Fred O'Malley
December 15th, 2010, 10:23 PM
She passed somewhere around 4:26 this afternoon while being held in my arms. Thanks for all your well wishes.
My deepest heartfelt condolences, Mick.
Armstrong
December 15th, 2010, 10:27 PM
My deepest heartfelt condolences, Mick.
Yes, thanks Fred. I appreciate that. It sure is quiet here now.
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 10:31 PM
Nah, he's just into accusing me of not knowing what a wetback looks like (for now, anyway).
I could've sworn I knew...having grown up & lived in Southern California for most of my life. :rolleyes:
How old are you and if you're over 21 and don't have a clue about 9/11 and it's perpetrators I might suggest you're a little out of your league here, my dear :)
I know young folks that age and they are 100% onto 9/11 and it's jewish roots
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 10:34 PM
She passed somewhere around 4:26 this afternoon while being held in my arms. Thanks for all your well wishes.
No one who has not suffered this personally can possibly understand. You have my prayers and my condolences, brother
Armstrong
December 15th, 2010, 10:37 PM
No one who has not suffered this personally can possibly understand. You have my prayers and my condolences, brother
Thank you very much Rob. I appreciate that. Neighbors and friends have come and gone, called and talked, children will all be here tomorrow. So we will all go on from here. Again thanks for your kind words my brother.
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 10:40 PM
It's unfortunate that he insulted Alex, and was therefore banned. It should have been you who was banned instead.
Agreed. It seems that only some animals are required to have equally thick skins here
Celtic_Patriot
December 15th, 2010, 10:50 PM
She passed somewhere around 4:26 this afternoon while being held in my arms. Thanks for all your well wishes.
I'm sorry to hear this. Pray hard Armstrong.
These hours are critical as she is being accepted unto God.
.
SmokyMtn
December 15th, 2010, 10:52 PM
Divide and Conquer? You may indeed be onto something. I've noticed the new "touchier, gentler, nicer" Duke lately. I can provide hearsay evidence from an older clansman who was there in the old days.. now this is just heresay but he told me that the Klan was utterly infiltrated and that Duke was on the FBI payroll. He warned me not to join
I am not saying it's true but this fellow was for real, a genuine Southern Klansman
Not sure if Duke was on the payroll, but all of the trusted klansmen bailed out years ago because of the infiltration by the feds.
Did you hear of a klan meeting in Missouri back in the late 80s where all the "klansmen" who showed up were informants? :hflol
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 10:53 PM
I'd guess that 95% of the viewcount is between all of you people. Those are definitely not unique hits. And may varg correct me, but every transition between pages counts as another hit, when the page is reloaded after each post, after each repping, reply, aborted reply, etc..
Viewcount is meaningless unless only unique hits are recorded.
Big fat nothing.
http://img526.imageshack.us/img526/2661/gflxs.jpg
I do not know how hits are counted but I have only visited this thread about 6 or 8 times in marathon sessions.. that's how my personal time is parceled out.. skeered yet?
Celtic_Patriot
December 15th, 2010, 10:54 PM
Thank you very much Rob. I appreciate that. Neighbors and friends have come and gone, called and talked, children will all be here tomorrow. So we will all go on from here. Again thanks for your kind words my brother.
Its time to get on your knees and pray like you have never prayed before. Talk to God.
.
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 10:56 PM
Thank you very much Rob. I appreciate that. Neighbors and friends have come and gone, called and talked, children will all be here tomorrow. So we will all go on from here. Again thanks for your kind words my brother.
She is no longer in pain and she is in Yahweh's bosom, brother. I think you will see her again in much better times. We do not have to see eye to eye in all theological matters for this to be so.. none of us knows all
Nick Apleece
December 15th, 2010, 10:59 PM
She passed somewhere around 4:26 this afternoon while being held in my arms. Thanks for all your well wishes.
I'm very sorry for your loss.
McKinley
December 15th, 2010, 11:00 PM
She passed somewhere around 4:26 this afternoon while being held in my arms. Thanks for all your well wishes.
Sorry to hear that, dude.
Rob MacGregor
December 15th, 2010, 11:05 PM
Not sure if Duke was on the payroll, but all of the trusted klansmen bailed out years ago because of the infiltration by the feds.
Did you hear of a klan meeting in Missouri back in the late 80s where all the "klansmen" who showed up were informants? :hflol
Yes, sounds like Butler's Aryan Nations :(
Goodnight lads.. must get a wood stove purring for a true WNist lady
Fred O'Malley
December 15th, 2010, 11:15 PM
Infiltrations
http://gangstalkingworld.com/infiltrations/
Targeted Individuals need to understand is the concept of Infiltration. This means that agents, hired operatives, civillian informants, etc will try to infiltrate your organizations or your life.
I recently posted an article about Infiltration of online groups. This has been happening for some time now. Many people think if they are posting online that they will not be investigated, but there are infiltrators who try to engage posters in conversations, where they get them to say things against the government, or use talk of violence, something that might not happen without the provocateur. These individuals are on most of the popular forums, and often you won’t know who they are. You might get a sense of who they are based on their postings, but that is not always the case.
Here on some things to be aware of regarding Infiltrations.
http://www.theage.com.au/news/technology/security/police-hire-private-spies-to-snoop-online/2008/11/26/1227491580370.html
Pete Stef
December 15th, 2010, 11:22 PM
She passed somewhere around 4:26 this afternoon while being held in my arms. Thanks for all your well wishes.I'm sorry for your loss, Mick. Country Roads died this morning too.
It's been a very very sad day.
Soldatul Vostru
December 15th, 2010, 11:24 PM
I'm sorry for your loss, Mick. Country Roads died this morning too.
It's been a very very sad day.
My condolences to all, may they both rest in peace.
Defender
December 15th, 2010, 11:26 PM
The safest thing to do is always act like they are watching or listening and keep all at arm's length. It is the safest way to be.
Savannah14
December 15th, 2010, 11:26 PM
She passed somewhere around 4:26 this afternoon while being held in my arms. Thanks for all your well wishes.
I am very, very sorry to hear that, but glad that there is no more pain for her. We lost our sister Country Roads this morning, too. A sad day all the way 'round. :(
SmokyMtn
December 15th, 2010, 11:34 PM
Infiltrations
http://gangstalkingworld.com/infiltrations/
Targeted Individuals need to understand is the concept of Infiltration. This means that agents, hired operatives, civillian informants, etc will try to infiltrate your organizations or your life.
Fred, I have been a target for sometime. Last year an informant finally nailed me for a low level misdemeanor.
My mistake? Calling the informant back where he got a recording of the time stamp, leading back to my home phone number, where he added a bogus recording of me threatening him.
Total bullshit, but the local prosecutor and judge did not give a damn, in their mind, they nailed a "dangerous White Supremacist".
The internet is a great tool for getting out information on what the jew is doing to our country, but be very careful with whom you meet. Informants are now fronting as White Nationalists, to get close to us.
My advice is to stick with the local people that you know, and to attend gatherings held by known White Nationalists.
My mistake is a common one that most Whites make, being too damn nice.
Defender
December 15th, 2010, 11:36 PM
Fred, I have been a target for sometime. Last year an informant finally nailed me for a low level misdemeanor.
My mistake? Calling the informant back where he got a recording of the time stamp, leading back to my home phone number, where he added a bogus recording of me threatening him.
Total bullshit, but the local prosecutor and judge did not give a damn, in their mind, they nailed a "dangerous White Supremacist".
The internet is a great tool for getting out information on what the jew is doing to our country, but be very careful with whom you meet. Informants are now fronting as White Nationalists, to get close to us.
My advice is to stick with the local people that you know, and to attend gatherings held by known White Nationalists.
My mistake is a common one that most Whites make, being too damn nice.
Very good advice.....
SmokyMtn
December 15th, 2010, 11:39 PM
The safest thing to do is always act like they are watching or listening and keep all at arm's length. It is the safest way to be.
Only when someone out of the blue seeks to meet you, that is when you put your guard up.
However, should you initiate a conversation with someone in your area, chances are nearly zip that that person is an informant.
Defender
December 15th, 2010, 11:53 PM
Well, with me, nobody in my community is an activist so I just am a loner. I cannot really be an activist anyways because of Gary. I just travel and speak about his situation and the treatment he receives from the Bureau of Prisons and I have met some really good folk.
SWhite
December 16th, 2010, 12:01 AM
I am very, very sorry to hear that, but glad that there is no more pain for her. We lost our sister Country Roads this morning, too. A sad day all the way 'round. :(
Yes, a terribly sad day, to be sure. :(
My sincerest condolences on the loss of your wife, Michael. Thoughts and prayers are with you, my friend. May she rest in peace.
STZ
December 16th, 2010, 12:11 AM
My deepest condolences to the family of Country Roads and yours as well, Mick. I did not know Country Roads but do remember reading her post in SM a few months back about her diagnosis. Terribly sorry to hear about these tragedies and regardless of the trivial infighting between us and SF, it's important for us to mourn these events together as one. :(
Donnie in Ohio
December 16th, 2010, 04:46 AM
The thread is in 'Nutzpah', true, and a lot of it is 'people bitching about being banned from an internet forum', but there is also more to it than that, namely the 9/11 issue.
There are currently two threads in the general section of the forum on 9/11. One of them has been a stickied thread for years, and has over 1,500 non-'Nutz posts in it.
If people look around the forum, they will see that it's actually laid out really well. There are categories for just about anything, and threads generally stay solidly on-track in those.
The following should in no way be construed as an attempt to inhibit you or anyone else from continued posting in this thread, obviously post where you will.
I'm just pointing out that if people have 9/11 material, or any material for that matter... that they want presented in a more serious venue, the general forum(s) would be a better fit.
The justly infamous, though often hilarious, Nutzpah lounge should probably be fairly low on your list of options is the take-away here.
Donnie in Ohio
December 16th, 2010, 06:15 AM
I'm sure the shitheadfromohio would probably like to circlejerk over whether or not they were jews..............LOL
Nah, I've made my point by simply posting the facts which prove that here on this plane of reality, none of the POTUS you claim were Jewish were, in fact, Jews.
I'm cool with letting you intellectual giants continue to illustrate just how utterly clueless you are all by yourselves on the matter any further. I'm sure you are quite used to being by yourselves, hence the invitation to a circlejerk.
Decorum dictates that I must thank you for the invitation, however my firm foundation in heterosexuality, coupled with allergies to petroleum-based lubricants must preclude my participation at this time.
Well, pretty much any time if we're getting into date specifics here.
I do hope you enjoy the aroma-therapy candles & the December copy of Bat-Shit Insane Monthly I had sent over for your circlejerk party.
RickHolland
December 16th, 2010, 06:59 AM
Derek's Mom works helping Latino Mexican "students".
Why shouldn't Derek get a little Mexican pussy?
http://white-pride.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/model4_couple.jpg
http://white-pride.org/
Mommy brought home a 5 foot tall Mexican beaner for Derek to fuck.
.
I am shocked. :eek:
I always thought he was Gay. :fag::confused:
Pat Healey
December 16th, 2010, 07:07 AM
I am shocked. :eek:
I always thought he was Gay. :fag::confused:
Look closely at that picture.
Look where Derek's right arm is - and look where it isn't.
Look at the little Beanerita's left arm...and look where it isn't.
Derek has his hands in his pockets and the Beanerita has her hands on her hips. From a body language point of view, the most significant thing is the fact that the Beanerita purposely keeps her pelvic area AWAY from Derek and leans toward him from the waist up...for the picture.
Those 2 are not "involved" with eachother.
Is Derek "RumpRider"...or "TheOtherGuy"? Hard to say....we need to see a picture of him with his boyfriend.
ray bateson
December 16th, 2010, 07:58 AM
Looks like those two are enjoying a good finger massage, actually. I hear it aids blood circulation. Nothing sexual at all.
Fred O'Malley
December 16th, 2010, 10:16 AM
I am shocked. :eek:
I always thought he was Gay. :fag::confused:
At least they were smart enough not to give her a White Pride shirt. ;)
Leonard Rouse
December 16th, 2010, 10:37 AM
Decorum dictates that I must thank you for the invitation, however my firm foundation in heterosexuality, coupled with allergies to petroleum-based lubricants must preclude my participation at this time.
They have stuff for you now. Chemistry is really amazing. :D
Leonard Rouse
December 16th, 2010, 10:38 AM
Looks like those two are enjoying a good finger massage, actually. I hear it aids blood circulation. Nothing sexual at all.
Is that how they're selling prostate exams now?
N.T. Bundy
December 16th, 2010, 11:11 AM
After perusing this thread, better known as the "Fred & Donnie Show", I must say it's a pity it had to end. I don't think there has been better entertainment since Comedy Central began.
So much to relate to and a lot of suspicions confirmed. Oddly, many decades ago I chatted with a Texas Klan girl about Duke and discovered she was not impressed with his unwanted philandering.
As far as some of the peripheral topics, at least on this thread, there was no mention of Eisenhower's African nose... strangely similar to Babe Ruth's. Just an observation.
Oh, and the one photo of the Pentagon... the one before it collapses is much more interesting but perhaps it is on another thread.
Hope to share more mutual interests!
MikeTodd
December 16th, 2010, 11:15 AM
Decorum dictates that I must thank you for the invitation, however my firm foundation in heterosexuality, coupled with allergies to petroleum-based lubricants must preclude my participation at this time.Spit works well in a pinch.:D
Rae Kiley
December 16th, 2010, 11:17 AM
She passed somewhere around 4:26 this afternoon while being held in my arms. Thanks for all your well wishes.
BIG ((HUGS)) My friend
Rae Kiley
December 16th, 2010, 11:22 AM
I'm sorry for your loss, Mick. Country Roads died this morning too.
It's been a very very sad day.
At least she is no longer in pain...she fought a brave battle.
Rest in Peace Country Roads.
Dixiedoll23
December 16th, 2010, 01:58 PM
My deepest condolences to the family of Country Roads and yours as well, Mick. I did not know Country Roads but do remember reading her post in SM a few months back about her diagnosis. Terribly sorry to hear about these tragedies and regardless of the trivial infighting between us and SF, it's important for us to mourn these events together as one. :(
Agreed.
Sorry to hear about you wife,Mick.My thoughts and prayers are with you brother.May she rest in Peace.
Country Roads passed away peacefully yesterday morning.A tumor developed in her lungs and grew so large it shut down her breathing.I got a chance to speak with her the week before she passed,and it was so good to hear her voice one last time,and to let her know her folk thought the world of her.
A sad day for all of us,and one we shall never forget. :(
Armstrong
December 16th, 2010, 02:18 PM
I'm sorry to hear this. Pray hard Armstrong.
These hours are critical as she is being accepted unto God.
.
Thank you for your condolences, Celtic Patriot. My wife lived her life in the heart of God. During her time of entry into the spirit world, the world of God, I felt I could see and hear some of what she was going through, as she came to great understanding of the things that had been of concern and bother to her in this life.
Its time to get on your knees and pray like you have never prayed before. Talk to God.
.
I spend much of my time in prayer. Not the down on my knees kind of prayer, but a constant, or frequent conversation with God.
She is no longer in pain and she is in Yahweh's bosom, brother. I think you will see her again in much better times. We do not have to see eye to eye in all theological matters for this to be so.. none of us knows all
This is so very true, Rob. For much of her last day her breathing was very difficult, and she had not been able to use her limbs for some time and had to be carried wherever she would go. She had other physical problems during the day, but by about 4pm a great peace came over here and filled our home. Her breathing became easy, I thought we had perhaps passed some healing hurtle, and she was on her road to coming back to health. We were both glad for the peace. I had been breathing with her, helping calm her during the day.
When this peace descended, I was holding her and telling her how much I loved her, thanking her for all the years we've had together, for our children, and then I realized her breath was slowing even more and that she was passing. I continued to hold her and speak my love to her even after she had stopped breathing.
I'm very sorry for your loss.
Thank you, Nick, Will be passing the condolences on to our children when they arrive. Have already had several friends come and go this morning, and our children will be here in another few hours.
Sorry to hear that, dude.
Yes, I was sorry to see it go that way too. Right up the end we were hoping for a full healing and a restoration to health for her. She loved life and had many more things she wanted to do and see.
I'm sorry for your loss, Mick. Country Roads died this morning too.
It's been a very very sad day.
I heard too. What's even more difficult in her case, is she had to leave a young child behind. My prayers and tears go to her family for what they are undoubtedly feeling. Country Roads was a very good person, and was a source of encouragement to my wife and I as we wound our way though the cancer adventure.
If I could have one prayer answered, it would be that no else has to go though cancer, or if that prayer is not possible, I would pray a cure is found for it. We believed we were on the path of finding a new therapy that will be far more effective in curing cancer. From a neuroscience perspective, in vitro studies and animal studies look good on it. It's going into human trials soon, or may already be in human trials. The active agent is cannabis. Sure laugh , but here's some of the science. (http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/66/13/6615.full)
I do know my wife had a new skin cancer pop up about 10 days ago, and the cannabis/coconut oil we'd made to use for her pain made it shrink overnight.
My condolences to all, may they both rest in peace.
Amen brother, thank you!!!
I am very, very sorry to hear that, but glad that there is no more pain for her. We lost our sister Country Roads this morning, too. A sad day all the way 'round. :(
Yes, me too. Especially about Country Roads and for her children. May God send help to her husband to fill in for her loss and the need for a mother her children have.
If anyone has contact for them, please express my sadness at her passing, and my condolences.
Wayne
December 16th, 2010, 02:30 PM
When this peace descended, I was holding her and telling her how much I loved her, thanking her for all the years we've had together, for our children, and then I realized her breath was slowing even more and that she was passing. I continued to hold her and speak my love to her even after she had stopped breathing.I'm sorry for your loss, Mick.
Nick Apleece
December 16th, 2010, 02:36 PM
We believed we were on the path of finding a new therapy that will be far more effective in curing cancer. From a neuroscience perspective, in vitro studies and animal studies look good on it. It's going into human trials soon, or may already be in human trials. The active agent is cannabis. Sure laugh , but here's some of the science. (http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/66/13/6615.full)
I am interested in the Warburg Effect: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warburg_hypothesis
The basic idea is that cancer is fueled by sugar, and can be eliminated with a ketogenic diet. Think "Atkins Plus", but not for weight loss.
Armstrong
December 16th, 2010, 03:08 PM
Yes, a terribly sad day, to be sure. :(
My sincerest condolences on the loss of your wife, Michael. Thoughts and prayers are with you, my friend. May she rest in peace.
Thank you so much SWhite. It means a lot. Yes, she passed into a very peaceful state for a good 20 minutes to half an hour before she died. It was a very special time.
My deepest condolences to the family of Country Roads and yours as well, Mick. I did not know Country Roads but do remember reading her post in SM a few months back about her diagnosis. Terribly sorry to hear about these tragedies and regardless of the trivial infighting between us and SF, it's important for us to mourn these events together as one. :(
Thanks, STZ, it's good to see you on this forum. I appreciate you condolences too, and will pass them on to our family which are all heading in this direction now. There's life, and then there's real life. This is real life, though I suppose the other is real life too. My deepest condolences to the family of Country Roads too. She was a straight, straightforward, very good woman. I think she and my wife would have spent time together had we lived near one another.
BIG ((HUGS)) My friend
Thank you, Rae, No more pain and no more having to be carried everywhere she went.
At least she is no longer in pain...she fought a brave battle.
Rest in Peace Country Roads.
Definitely prayers for Country Roads and her family too.
Agreed.
Sorry to hear about you wife,Mick.My thoughts and prayers are with you brother.May she rest in Peace.
Country Roads passed away peacefully yesterday morning.A tumor developed in her lungs and grew so large it shut down her breathing.I got a chance to speak with her the week before she passed,and it was so good to hear her voice one last time,and to let her know her folk thought the world of her.
A sad day for all of us,and one we shall never forget. :(
Thank you DixieDoll, I appreciate your condolences. One time you sent me a video. Do you remember which one it was? Was it's I'll fly away? If you remember, I could use having it again, though it may be in my bookmarks.
Will talk more soon. Much love and well wishes to you and your family May you find peace and condolence with the passing of Country Roads. I feel more pain and anguish for their family than I do for mine. There's a story about the Budda that ties into this, but I'll tell you that one later.
Wayne wrote: I'm sorry for your loss, Mick.
Thanks Wayne, that means a lot coming from a man such as yourself. Many blessings to you and yours. Hope we can talk more in the coming days as things settle in around here.
Warm regards to everyone,
Michael
Simo Häyhä
December 16th, 2010, 04:47 PM
Well, after the much needed and well deserved condolences, I bid my excuse to bump this thread back into place.
So...
Would you please be so kind as to explain, then, how on earth could some people survive in such a hot enviroment without melting into a puddle of goo?
http://img256.imageshack.us/img256/5762/survivor2.jpg (http://img256.imageshack.us/i/survivor2.jpg/)
PS.: Human skin MELTS at around 100C (212F), give or take. That is roughly a mere 10% of the temperature needed to melt steel, as your article suggests.
It's been 3 days, Georgie boy. Are you going to provide an answer to my inquiry or are you going to put your tail between your legs and walk away hoping you go unnoticed?
I'm waiting...
Armstrong
December 16th, 2010, 05:11 PM
I am interested in the Warburg Effect: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warburg_hypothesis
The basic idea is that cancer is fueled by sugar, and can be eliminated with a ketogenic diet. Think "Atkins Plus", but not for weight loss.
There may be many factors involved in the creation of body conditions that may harbor cancer. Each and everyone one of them deserve FULL investigation and examination.
You're right, cancer feeds on sugar, but we need certain sugars, or the breakdown components that turn into sugar to run our bodies. Most of the factory produced food with additives, and farm raised meat and milk with added hormones also feed the cancer fires, which once ignited, are near possible to put out, using current medicines.
So it will need to be a multiphase investigation. There are also some indications so far that personal thinking patterns and lifestyle choices, plus how adverse early childhood events are dealt with in a person's life, that may be indicative or causative factors in the later development of the disease as well.
Plus, current Cancer therapy, at least Breast Cancer treatment relies on shutting down the Tyrosine Kinase inhibitor pathway, the MAPK pathway, etc. Multiplicities of drugs using the similar mechanisms in their attempts to accomplish the same things.
Cannabis therapy, works on different neural pathways to control Cancer. If the human trials prove helpful once the cold hard eye of science has studied it deeply, works on totally different neural pathways, the CDC2 pathway being among one of the primary pathways that are involved. It does not shut down the Tyrosine Kinase pathway which is essential to the functioning of ones own natural immune system. Rather cannabis kicks the tyrosine kinase pathway into high gear, boosting the immune system.
Time will tell on all of this.
Fred O'Malley
December 16th, 2010, 05:33 PM
Simo, if you'll notice, there is a second victim, a woman, standing in the lower right corner.
http://i605.photobucket.com/albums/tt139/ZioSlayer/wtc1_man-1.jpg
Rob MacGregor
December 16th, 2010, 08:27 PM
Let's attempt to behave like forensic scientists or detectives.. is there an Israeli based or jew owned demolition business out there?
This was done by pros
Armstrong
December 16th, 2010, 08:39 PM
Let's attempt to behave like forensic scientists or detectives.. is there an Israeli based or jew owned demolition business out there?
This was done by pros
Our in house UDT teams are experienced demolition crews. The private sector of the business could be researched for ownerships. Though the largest Israeli based demolition business is Mossad.
Check the yellow pages. They may be listed, or they may be contacted through the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs, specializing in huge trouble world wide.
Fred O'Malley
December 16th, 2010, 08:58 PM
Let's attempt to behave like forensic scientists or detectives.. is there an Israeli based or jew owned demolition business out there?
This was done by pros
An interesting fact is that the same demolition company which demoed the WTC also demoed the Murrah bldg and has been involved in political intrigue a long time. I think they can keep their mouth shut about evidence.
Rob MacGregor
December 16th, 2010, 09:14 PM
Our in house UDT teams are experienced demolition crews. The private sector of the business could be researched for ownerships. Though the largest Israeli based demolition business is Mossad.
Check the yellow pages. They may be listed, or they may be contacted through the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs, specializing in huge trouble world wide.
See, I'm thinking that some itsalie company is possibly demoing for profit and in that case it would already have strong Mossad ties
Of course it could be the other way around and demo people have been recruited as full time Mossad. It would only take a small crew to wire those buildings, maybe 4 to 6 guys?
Donnie in Ohio
December 16th, 2010, 09:23 PM
After perusing this thread, better known as the "Fred & Donnie Show", I must say it's a pity it had to end. I don't think there has been better entertainment since Comedy Central began.
To everything....turn turn turn....There is a season....turn turn turn....
"Fred & Donnie Show"?
I think it is obvious it should be the "Donnie & Fred Show".
If he can't get me top billing over Fred for chrissakes, what do I even have an agent for?
Oy Ze Hate
December 16th, 2010, 09:27 PM
Simo, if you'll notice, there is a second victim, a woman, standing in the lower right corner.
http://i605.photobucket.com/albums/tt139/ZioSlayer/wtc1_man-1.jpg
A Towering Inferno, itz!
9-11 = T.J.B.
Those two poor doomed people were probably thinking "Fire's out, can't wait to get out of this place." As no doubt hundreds of others in them were as well.
A few minutes later...Adios Towers. Boom! Boom! Boom! Boom! Crash...at free fall speed.
This album cover came out before Lucky Larry's Big Day.
http://septterror.tripod.com/images/popcult/coup.jpg
Not evidence, but hey, what a coincidence right?
Fenria
December 16th, 2010, 10:45 PM
She passed somewhere around 4:26 this afternoon while being held in my arms. Thanks for all your well wishes.
She was a wonderful person, Mick, and I'm happy I got to meet her! I hope you're holding up.
Bryan67
December 17th, 2010, 12:07 AM
How can anyone who has been exposed to some of these facts still support SpermFart?
I've thought about that also, & my .02 on the various personas who remain:
1) Those who have spent considerable time there don't want to flush all their previous effort down the toilet; it would be psychologically torturous for them to pull up their stakes & head elsewhere. It ain't easy giving up something after you've invested so much emotional & intellectual energy into it.
2) Some would easily dismiss intelligent friends, valuable contributors & side with the new agenda if it would allow them to stay on board & accrue some more flashy gems & prestige; these types love hierarchy & are under the assumption that seniority & position denote wisdom.
3) Also at play is some degree of denial that "everything is fine & will work itself out" to keep any internal conflicts at bay.
4) And I suppose "the bigger, the better" element plays a factor, too. "SF is the biggest, baddest WN site out there & I'm hitching my wagon to their cause because the biggest is always right!", some think.
My name on SF was Eurocentric, & I essentially wasted 6.5 years at that circus. I thought something was fishy when MuadDib got canned, but it didn't become self-evident until this latest fiasco. Looking back, that place probably never devolved, meaning that its stated purpose from Day 1 was likely to filter 99% of the creative White energy to their site for the purpose of muting it.
At any rate, I'm glad I found this site ...
littlefieldjohn
December 17th, 2010, 12:18 AM
I still post there just to smoke out the lurkers and trolls, but they just started to moderate my messages. They probably read one of my private messages, so I guess my clock is ticking.
Until my sustaining membership runs out, I intend to get my money's worth and affirm the legitimate and sincere, and poke holes in trollboats when I am able to.
N. Wolf
December 17th, 2010, 01:06 AM
I still post there just to smoke out the lurkers and trolls, but they just started to moderate my messages. They probably read one of my private messages, so I guess my clock is ticking.
Until my sustaining membership runs out, I intend to get my money's worth and affirm the legitimate and sincere, and poke holes in trollboats when I am able to.
It's ridiculous that anyone has to worry about being put on moderation or being banned just for going on a supposedly White Nationalist forum to fight trolls. That tells us a lot about the nature of the Stormfront leadership now. We may as well regard Jack Boot himself as a troll at this point.
Defender
December 17th, 2010, 01:08 AM
Why are people so quick to defend Black and Stormfront? What has Black and that stupid website done that is so great? It has caused more harm than anything and people defend it as if it was a martyr and he was a martyr....
N. Wolf
December 17th, 2010, 01:14 AM
Why are people so quick to defend Black and Stormfront? What has Black and that stupid website done that is so great? It has caused more harm than anything and people defend it as if it was a martyr and he was a martyr....
People have trouble getting used to the fact that one of the largest WN sites is now ruined and that Black, a once popular racialist leader, became corrupt. I always looked to more ideal leaders like Codreanu, Hitler, and Mosley, so I don't hesitate to criticise Black, he's not as big of a deal for me as he is for others. Though I was very shocked to find out what he became.
littlefieldjohn
December 17th, 2010, 01:23 AM
I've thought about that also, & my .02 on the various personas who remain:
1) Those who have spent considerable time there don't want to flush all their previous effort down the toilet; it would be psychologically torturous for them to pull up their stakes & head elsewhere. It ain't easy giving up something after you've invested so much emotional & intellectual energy into it.
2) Some would easily dismiss intelligent friends, valuable contributors & side with the new agenda if it would allow them to stay on board & accrue some more flashy gems & prestige; these types love hierarchy & are under the assumption that seniority & position denote wisdom.
3) Also at play is some degree of denial that "everything is fine & will work itself out" to keep any internal conflicts at bay.
4) And I suppose "the bigger, the better" element plays a factor, too. "SF is the biggest, baddest WN site out there & I'm hitching my wagon to their cause because the biggest is always right!", some think.
My name on SF was Eurocentric, & I essentially wasted 6.5 years at that circus. I thought something was fishy when MuadDib got canned, but it didn't become self-evident until this latest fiasco. Looking back, that place probably never devolved, meaning that its stated purpose from Day 1 was likely to filter 99% of the creative White energy to their site for the purpose of muting it.
At any rate, I'm glad I found this site ...
It is better to learn now than later, I guess.
Things always work out for the best. SF is a total mess; I wouldn't be surprised if the entire enterprise shuts down since they are rudderless and hollow .
One website, trolled down to where it doesn't know whether to sh*t or wind it's watch, will not make a difference in the long run.
I am also very grateful to Alex Linder and will put some donations in his hands as soon as I am able to.
John Liberty
December 17th, 2010, 01:37 AM
1 Those who have spent considerable time there don't want to flush all their previous effort down the toilet; it would be psychologically torturous for them to pull up their stakes & head elsewhere. It ain't easy giving up something after you've invested so much emotional & intellectual energy into it. by Bryan67
Yes, being established was probably the reason I hung on also. But, I saw the writing on the wall when some of the members on my friends list got disappeared down the memoryhole.. And when the Kosherfront hitman "mikhaelis the kike" told me I wouldn't be long for SF, I knew it was time to pack my bags. I think they wanted to clean out all the "Kraut" lovers once and for all. Probably want to appeal to a more diverse cliental. (I think I will stick with the Germans).
http://germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org/images/highres_30021977%20copy.jpg
http://whitenoiseinsanity.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/hitleryeswecan.gif
RickHolland
December 17th, 2010, 08:08 AM
I still post there just to smoke out the lurkers and trolls, but they just started to moderate my messages. They probably read one of my private messages, so I guess my clock is ticking.
Until my sustaining membership runs out, I intend to get my money's worth and affirm the legitimate and sincere, and poke holes in trollboats when I am able to.
Why don't you register another account?
At least you know that after some time you will be unmoderated.
People have trouble getting used to the fact that one of the largest WN sites is now ruined and that Black, a once popular racialist leader, became corrupt.
Stormfront has been ruined for a long time but you only noticed it now.
Armstrong
December 17th, 2010, 09:00 AM
See, I'm thinking that some itsalie company is possibly demoing for profit and in that case it would already have strong Mossad ties
Of course it could be the other way around and demo people have been recruited as full time Mossad. It would only take a small crew to wire those buildings, maybe 4 to 6 guys?
I recall reading stories about the power being shut down on certain floors in day previous to the towers coming down. As I recall, there were stories about people hearing 'drilling' sounds. Don't have those stories right now though. Think they may have been on Eastman's groups site, but he banned me for using the words 'Israel' and Jew' too many times. Perhaps one of our sleuth's can find those stories.
Fred O'Malley
December 17th, 2010, 10:48 AM
I recall reading stories about the power being shut down on certain floors in day previous to the towers coming down. As I recall, there were stories about people hearing 'drilling' sounds. Don't have those stories right now though. Think they may have been on Eastman's groups site, but he banned me for using the words 'Israel' and Jew' too many times. Perhaps one of our sleuth's can find those stories.
Here's a whole slew of them (http://www.google.com/search?q=power+outages+9%2F11+wtc&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a)
Fred O'Malley
December 17th, 2010, 10:51 AM
OKC & WTC-7 - The Case
For Controlled Demolitions
"Numerous firemen were telling me that they heard numerous secondary explosions all over the building - these guys are seasoned firefighting professionals - a lot of them have military backgrounds and they're not stupid." -- Major Michael McCormack, WTC first responder.
Incredible Government Lies (http://www.rense.com/general73/okc.htm)
Rob MacGregor
December 17th, 2010, 01:34 PM
Here's a whole slew of them (http://www.google.com/search?q=power+outages+9%2F11+wtc&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a)
From one of the links:
Corbett, who worked on the 97th floor, says there was a ‘power down’ on the week-end prior to September 11 for approximately 24 to 36 hours. During this period, he says, “there was a complete breakdown of security that weekend because of the power down.”
According to Corbett, the power down started on Friday night, at close of business and only came back on Sunday afternoon.
Hmm, seems 24 to 36 hours would be plenty of time for a team to wire for demolition, since only every third floor had to be set up and they likely already had the charges set up for quick install
I'm surprised a building of that size and prestige did not have a backup power system
littlefieldjohn
December 17th, 2010, 01:40 PM
It's pretty much worthless wreckage over there right now.I think they plan to renovate into something along the lines of a Unite with the Jews against the Islamic threat 'discussion 'group
Fred O'Malley
December 17th, 2010, 03:59 PM
From one of the links:
Hmm, seems 24 to 36 hours would be plenty of time for a team to wire for demolition, since only every third floor had to be set up and they likely already had the charges set up for quick install
I'm surprised a building of that size and prestige did not have a backup power system
There were "construction crews" working inside those buildings for over 3 weeks, purportedly installing new internet wiring. So, they only needed the power-down to complete the wiring terminals.
First, "rewiring" for internet is bogus. Why not use hi-speed wifi instead? The equipment could have been installed at 2% of the cost of crews for 2-3 weeks plus power-down.
Also, there were power-downs on 2 successive weekends.
Fred O'Malley
December 17th, 2010, 04:11 PM
It's pretty much worthless wreckage over there right now.I think they plan to renovate into something along the lines of a Unit with the Jews against the Islamic threat 'discussion 'group
Changes were forced upon them due to JB's rash, stupified blunder.
WR14's ass-covering, saying they are moving in a new direction, is BS.
ShameFront has been destroyed, their moderation is over the top and over zealous. The mods are power-tripping and inept. The site lost all it's worthwhile posters. They are in shambles with no plan of recovery or to attract and keep anything resembling dedicated members.
They destroyed their base and dissillusioned those left behind. The good ones remaining are waiting for the axe to fall. The ones with courage left or were banned, and nobody wants to go to a jew pity-party.
Defender
December 17th, 2010, 04:53 PM
I will personally throw a party the day SF closes its site down...that site is nothing but a thorn in the side of our people....
Fred O'Malley
December 17th, 2010, 09:20 PM
I understand they opened a 9/11 thread and the lezbo feminazis are laying in a pile at JB's feet.
Too late ShameFront, you pissed in your own tea cup.
Soldatul Vostru
December 17th, 2010, 09:23 PM
I will personally throw a party the day SF closes its site down...that site is nothing but a thorn in the side of our people....
I'm with you, especially when they keep these kind of disrespecting assholes on board: http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t765280/
Fred O'Malley
December 17th, 2010, 09:32 PM
I'm with you, especially when they keep these kind of disrespecting assholes on board: http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t765280/
Well, thank goodness for that.....he won't be back. Faggots need to stay home, don't you think?
Soldatul Vostru
December 17th, 2010, 09:39 PM
Well, thank goodness for that.....he won't be back. Faggots need to stay home, don't you think?
No, he was banned from WNN, NOT VNN. Two different forums. His account's still active here, though somehow I doubt he'll be back.
But the point was, the way he is talking about Susan and her husband is disgraceful - no true pro-white site would tolerate that.
So I give WNN credit for banning his ass for 6 months, though I would have went for the permanent ban.
AussieWN
December 17th, 2010, 10:17 PM
I'm with you, especially when they keep these kind of disrespecting assholes on board: http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t765280/For someone that had a go at members here about the way we talk of SF,he really shows what an arrogant spoilt little shit he really is. I was on WNN at the time he was attacking Susan and he got what he deserved. I notice he has now gone screaming home to SF to tell everyone how the bad people at WNN treated him..to stadgedog...Grow a pair you little tosser
RickHolland
December 17th, 2010, 10:19 PM
I understand they opened a 9/11 thread and the lezbo feminazis are laying in a pile at JB's feet.
Too late ShameFront, you pissed in your own tea cup.
After heavy editing they reopen it and try to convince the remaining Shitfront members that the bans were fair.
Calling those who disagree with him suspect.
Let's see who is actually suspect here:
Many names? Cult leader? And our members are gutless tripe!
And a half dozen followed their resurrected cult leader into drinking
the Kool Aid...again.
Oh my, they claim we must be JOOS! So says the Scott Roberts sock
puppet parade and the remnants of the Hal Turner Fan Club.
Seriously, folks.
Thread closed.
We've moved the mother of all 9/11 threads into our shiny new subforum and reopened it. It's worth a read, all 40 pages.
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t753009-39/
I'm with you, especially when they keep these kind of disrespecting assholes on board: http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t765280/
No! VNN members can go **** themselves! Disgusting White trash.
Shalomfront poser calling other WN's that post at VNN "WHITE TRASH".
Fred O'Malley
December 17th, 2010, 11:08 PM
Why is it all I can see are the first and last post, when I click on the link?
STZ
December 17th, 2010, 11:11 PM
Stagedog is literally retarded. Haven't we established that already? The guy is proud to work for Jews, why does he post on ANY WN forums at all? :rolleyes:
Peter Cordes
December 17th, 2010, 11:12 PM
I'm with you, especially when they keep these kind of disrespecting assholes on board: http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t765280/
They deleted all the posts including the reposts of Wolfgang aka stagedog.
I saw the thread this morning. The debate sounded as if an undercover fed would try to intimidate SusanYarborough. He was bullying her, asking her to resign from the Internet and back down.
http://www.whitenewsnow.com/forums/law-white-folks/12048-interview-about-gary-yarbroughs-situation-tonight.html
Only one quote by stagedog/wolfgang remained:
Originally Posted by Wolfgang View Post
Freedom of speech, freedom of association, freedom of almost anything is history.
Especially for convicted felons inside.
You asked, ''Who are they?'' Silly question. ''They'' are calling the shots, and have the power to free him. ''They'' killed Kennedy in front of his wife, in broad daylight, caused several world wars, and have the most advanced military on the planet. Along with many other things, that I'm sure you're well aware of.
Remember that.
The ban was well deserved.
My account there is still working. I have no intentions of ever visiting either forum again though.
Besides, I could care less what Mr.Linder has to say about it.
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t765280/#post8788747
It was Jamie's forum. It's almost impossible to get banned from VNN.
Rob MacGregor
December 17th, 2010, 11:45 PM
Stagedog is literally retarded. Haven't we established that already? The gay is proud to work for Jews, why does he post on ANY WN forums at all? :rolleyes:
Fixed your typo :fag:
SmokyMtn
December 18th, 2010, 12:01 AM
Fixed your typo :fag:
Exactly.
Unlike Fairydog, I have enough sense to respect the Lone Wolves that are out there.
Message to Don Black, your number is up.
Glad that I am not in your shoes.
Bryan67
December 18th, 2010, 12:12 AM
I will personally throw a party the day SF closes its site down...that site is nothing but a thorn in the side of our people....
Even though I despise that site like most here, it might be good to keep SF going for the time being. At least we know where to find the enemy. OTOH, they do dupe quite a few innocents & that doesn't sit well with me; perhaps word-of-mouth & alternate websites will result in it being just another "WN" site over time, maybe 5 years? Reputation (along w/advertising, of course) drives businesses, perhaps a bad rep will drive it into the ground in the coming years ... at which point another controlled forum becomes "THEE Place to be if you're a WN".
Roy
December 18th, 2010, 01:14 AM
Exlax is a fucking retard. Here's one of his comments from a thread about some "WN'ist gang arrests". He doesn't even know which thread he's posting in. He thinks he's posting in an anchor-mestizo thread. He can't even get something as basic as commenting in the right thread.
A commenter said:
We should outlaw anchor babies and deport their parents.
I'm pretty sure I fell out of my chair laughing
A new low for SF moderators. Just give the boy a rattle and some pots and pans to bang on, and he'll be entertained.
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t765361/#post8789416
EDIT: Could someone please re-post the photo shop of that old ugly guy talking on a cell phone looking at a laptop with a star of david on it? That's absolutely hilarious.
Defender
December 18th, 2010, 01:31 AM
True maybe SF does need to stay open to know where our enemies are at; however, I am finding out they are starting their campaign to discredit me before I get my official paperwork that names Stormfront as the reason my husband got his additional 15 years. That will not work though because up until I started fighting for my husband, I was housewife, college student, and parent......and was very quiet. However, I see they are going to try to play dirty pool....
AussieWN
December 18th, 2010, 02:03 AM
True maybe SF does need to stay open to know where our enemies are at; however, I am finding out they are starting their campaign to discredit me before I get my official paperwork that names Stormfront as the reason my husband got his additional 15 years. That will not work though because up until I started fighting for my husband, I was housewife, college student, and parent......and was very quiet. However, I see they are going to try to play dirty pool....SF will try everything to discredit you and your fight to free your husband. Stadgedog`s thread(which has been locked) is typical of SF tactics. When I was a sustaining member,the biggest thread in the sustaing section was.. who is a troll,where they bagged out non sustaining members and members who had just been banned. SF can not shut you up so they will do what ever they can to discredit you. You have them scared. The truth is getting out there and they can not control the flow of information.
Soldatul Vostru
December 18th, 2010, 10:20 AM
After heavy editing they reopen it and try to convince the remaining Shitfront members that the bans were fair.
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t753009-39/
Shalomfront poser calling other WN's that post at VNN "WHITE TRASH".
How true would you say the following is:
There's more than White trash on VNN. There are some clever, intelligent people who start, perpetuate flame wars at the drop of a hat. They cling to this with more tenacity than to breathing. They act like the laboratory monkey that keeps pushing the lever to get an electrical brain stimulation, even giving up eating, sex as a reward.
I believe that VNN should be allowed to exist. As a location for their existence, I propose Neptune. Wait, Pluto.
I'm not disputing the "more than White trash on VNN", nor the "clever", "Intelligent people" bit, I'm just asking your opinion on the rest of it.
Does anyone here actually "perpetuate flame wars at the drop of a hat", or "cling to this with more tenacity than to breathing"?
I don't. I was just irritated by the way Stagemutt was talking about Susan and her husband - otherwise I wouldn't have posted anything about SF at this point.
Thoughts.
MikeTodd
December 18th, 2010, 11:03 AM
In my time here at VNN I have seen much in the way of criticism towards SF and some of it's individual members but never have I seen the kind of vitriol and calumnies heaped upon their membership as a whole in the same manner as they habitually disparage the members here. Quite telling, itz.T.J.B.LIKE!
("White trash", indeed! <humpf!>)
Fred O'Malley
December 18th, 2010, 11:05 AM
How true would you say the following is:
I'm not disputing the "more than White trash on VNN", nor the "clever", "Intelligent people" bit, I'm just asking your opinion on the rest of it.
Does anyone here actually "perpetuate flame wars at the drop of a hat", or "cling to this with more tenacity than to breathing"?
I don't. I was just irritated by the way Stagemutt was talking about Susan and her husband - otherwise I wouldn't have posted anything about SF at this point.
Thoughts.
Originally Posted by Latebloomer
There's more than White trash on VNN. There are some clever, intelligent people who start, perpetuate flame wars at the drop of a hat
I'm sure this dimwit was referring to me & Donnie, due to our debates in this thread. I doubt that poster has the intellect or fortitude to review the whole site. Even if it was a flame war, it was fun to do. :D
I'm not en amoured with Donnie, but he was a worthy adversary, until I vanquished him.
He was beaten starting at 4370: http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=118454&page=219
John Liberty
December 18th, 2010, 12:49 PM
Originally Posted by STZ
Stagedog is literally retarded. Haven't we established that already? The gay is proud to work for Jews, why does he post on ANY WN forums at all?
The fact that the pro-heeb faggot has not been banned here shows the incredible leniency at VNN towards already ID'ed trolls. The idiot has the audacity to call himself a WN after arguing with Gary's wife, reinforces what we already knew long ago, if anything Wolfie is a crypto-WN.
John Liberty
December 18th, 2010, 01:43 PM
Originally Posted by Latebloomer
There's more than White trash on VNN. There are some clever, intelligent people who start, perpetuate flame wars at the drop of a hat
I'm sure this dimwit was referring to me & Donnie, due to our debates in this thread. I doubt that poster has the intellect or fortitude to review the whole site. Even if it was a flame war, it was fun to do. by Fred
I think Kosherfront has far more anti-WN flamers than VNN because they are coddled over there. And I also think that the animosity that Latebloomer displays is in reference to a flame war he was in on the VNN "Ed Steele thread", it seems his veracity was in doubt at that time due to his letting one of Ed's kids use his computer? Even though I wasn't a VNN member at the time, I was following the thread becuase Bjarni had shut down the Kosherfront thread on Steele. (on orders from Don Schwarz no doubt ). So, since I didn't have an active account at that time on VNN, I didn't enter the fray. later on , I actually saw this "latebloomer' at a David Duke talk up in Sandpoint (by Sagle ID, and which is only an hour drive from Spokane) that we both attended, so I am fairly certain that he is legit. Looks like he is still a VNN forum member, maybe he is just spouting some "sour grapes" now.
http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=112164&page=54
At the time of this interaction, Cyndi Steele had not yet come forward to protest here husbands innocence because the Feds had told her it was to dangerous with all the terrorist bombers running around Northern Idaho. Of course us diehard Steele supporters knew the score already, it was another Fed sting operation. Funny, SF closed the Steele thread because of the all the heeb trolls calling us Steele supporters "CT'ers". I think that is when the oldman smelled a big kosher rat.
Donnie in Ohio
December 18th, 2010, 02:00 PM
I'm sure this dimwit was referring to me & Donnie, due to our debates in this thread. I doubt that poster has the intellect or fortitude to review the whole site. Even if it was a flame war, it was fun to do. :D
I'm not en amoured with Donnie, but he was a worthy adversary, until I vanquished him.
He was beaten starting at 4370: http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=118454&page=219
Only in your most fevered dreams, Fred.
The guy mentioned "clever and intelligent". I'm fairly certain he wasn't referring to you.
You couldn't vanquish a bowl of oatmeal.
You come across as unstable, to be brutally honest.
"Enamoured" is one word, btw.
littlefieldjohn
December 18th, 2010, 02:30 PM
SF will try everything to discredit you and your fight to free your husband. Stadgedog`s thread(which has been locked) is typical of SF tactics. When I was a sustaining member,the biggest thread in the sustaing section was.. who is a troll,where they bagged out non sustaining members and members who had just been banned. SF can not shut you up so they will do what ever they can to discredit you. You have them scared. The truth is getting out there and they can not control the flow of information.
If you refer to the 'I am sick of the anarchists here at stormfront' thread, it was unlocked as of an hour ago, at an opportune time.
Fred O'Malley
December 18th, 2010, 02:31 PM
I'm sure Douchebag in Ohio just answered my post above, but I have it on ignore. Thus, I will leave the determination up to the veiwers in this thread.
Donnie in Ohio
December 18th, 2010, 02:43 PM
I'm sure Douchebag in Ohio just answered my post above, but I have it on ignore. Thus, I will leave the determination up to the veiwers in this thread.
Agreed. We'll leave it up to the veiwers. The viewers, too.
RickHolland
December 18th, 2010, 02:56 PM
These two trolls above are a clear symptom of a weakening control of WNs over this board.
The simple fact is that even quarter Jews can be easily segregated from the White European population based on a DNA test.
It will be so sad to see ICE taking down this site as well…
But what are they going to do with this thread?
They will delete the WN posts and allow the trolls’ stand?
Whenever you push him to the wall he will keep psycho-bubbling to fill up the thread with crap. They are basically aiming to dilute the material placed in order not to leave it clearly visible for the analytically challenged.
In other words it is a damage control operation on their part.
In Israel they are training thousands of freaks constantly just to do this.
Kosherfront at its best.
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t86925-204/
John Liberty
December 18th, 2010, 03:04 PM
originally posted by Fred
I'm sure Douchebag in Ohio just answered my post above, but I have it on ignore. Thus, I will leave the determination up to the veiwers in this thread.
__________________
Now that he has been outed as an SF team player, you have been vindicated Fred.
Stagefag/Wolfie isn't posting as much here, so Don wanted to chime in to support his buddies over at SF, ( Donnie Schwarz and JB).
He is probably hanging up a picture of "Ike the Kike" as we speak. :D
MikeTodd
December 18th, 2010, 03:06 PM
RE: Fred O'Malley
Pro tip: Hit 'spell check' BEFORE pressing 'Submit Reply'.
(will save you much grief):D
Fred O'Malley
December 18th, 2010, 03:11 PM
Now that he has been outed as an SF team player, you have been vindicated Fred.
Thanks, JL, I appreciate your vote. :)
Fred O'Malley
December 18th, 2010, 03:26 PM
RE: Fred O'Malley
Pro tip: Hit 'spell check' BEFORE pressing 'Submit Reply'.
(will save you much grief):D
I would do that, but I had some conflicts with spellcheck, had to delete it. I also transpose letters sometimes when I type. BFD!
To my mind, it is the concept I'm trying to convey, not my language perfection. If you understand, that suits me just fine.
Donnie in Ohio
December 18th, 2010, 03:32 PM
Now that he has been outed as an SF team player, you have been vindicated Fred.
meh...Believe what you want.
Donnie in Ohio
December 18th, 2010, 03:45 PM
RE: Fred O'Malley
Pro tip: Hit 'spell check' BEFORE pressing 'Submit Reply'.
(will save you much grief):D
It's like clubbing a paraplegic baby seal on Valium.
AussieWN
December 18th, 2010, 04:37 PM
If you refer to the 'I am sick of the anarchists here at stormfront' thread, it was unlocked as of an hour ago, at an opportune time.I was refering to stadgedog`s hissy fit thread about being banned from WNN. The thread you mention however shows that stadgedog is not a WN in that he is just another of those that thinks everyone should be supporting the army even though its doing nothing to protect America and is doing whatever israel wants. He is a puppet who supports puppets. He is the perfect SF recruit. To stupid to realise that the very people he supports are doing nothing to protect White people.
MikeTodd
December 18th, 2010, 04:59 PM
To my mind, it is the concept I'm trying to convey, not my language perfection.Linder has some pretty strong veiws on that very subject.
Fred O'Malley
December 18th, 2010, 05:00 PM
Stagedog, a/k/a wolfgang, isn't worth the trouble. He should only be quoted to give WNs a good laugh. His illogic is as bad as those who post only to piss people off, disjoint their work, and shit on threads. (You know who you are).
SD/WG is just laughable, he's dumb as a rock and mean as a snake. It must really suck being him. :)
Jimmy McQuade
December 18th, 2010, 05:47 PM
Wayne thought Fionn of PAA was An Faolchú Fionn on Stormfront.
More from Wayne's World.
http://i1101.photobucket.com/albums/g423/sent_1/WayneMuadDibFionnPAAScreenshot.gif
An Faolchú Fionn on Stormfront, who Wayne links to: http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showpost.php?p=4282405&postcount=110 is a different person. Wayne's gone insane, he's biting everything, like a rabid dog.
.
An Faolchú Fionn = The White Wolf in Irish (gaelic)
Fionn = White
Not an uncommon word to be used in White Nationalist sites, I would assume.
The mixup between me (An Faolchú Fionn) and that other user would explain some of the strange rep messages I would get from time to time.
Griften
December 18th, 2010, 05:52 PM
You know, after 16 years in the business you'd figure even the most preliminary steps would have been taken by the self proclaimed leaders of Stormfront (and elsewhere). Being a internet entity that floats ethereally does complicate things, especially since everyone is spread throughout a large nation, but they seem to meet each other at least sparingly as evidenced by the Jack Boot/Derek Black picture above.
So my question is, why has no step been taken to consolidate formally? Why during their dinners, or conferences, or whatever they did, these great White Nationalist leaders who wish to reclaim our country, did not start making policy with one another? If they took a step in a particular direction, whether right or wrong, they would have to take responsibility for it and therefore they will be judged by it. But such judgment comes with leadership, and winning isn't going to happen without such steps forward.
I have heard the line that " Stormfront is a forum for discussion, nothing more" used in its defense toward a lack of action. But that is not what Stormfront admin itself claims, they claim to be at the forefront of White Nationalism, the end-all-be-all for "the cause". After-all isn't that why they require $7,500 a month to sustain themselves?
Why have so many questions been laid out unanswered? What are we going to do? Who is the enemy? What is our policy towards X and Y? Who are "we"? Who is White? What can I do to help? What points should we use in our day-to-day arguments? What proper tone should we adopt on race-mixing/religious discussion/non-whites/9-11/holocaust/moon landings/ lizards in royal famiilies/UFOs mind controlling politicians/homosexuals/Iran/ etc etc etc. if any? Which personages currently involved in the scene do we ascribe as allies? Which personages do we hold in contempt as controlled dissent or utterly incompetent? The list goes on and on.
What about consolidating those enlightened persons into an identity? What about working towards unifying the thousands of WN out there with thousands of conflicting viewpoints with a umbrella belief system? What about teaching (re-teaching) those concerned whites about the strength of one voice? What about making them understand that there is only the subjective viewpoint and never the objective viewpoint when you deal in ideological war? Ask a rabbi any question with even the SLIGHTEST detail involving Judaism and he will only give a subjective answer. Why are there people who claim to be our side even THINKING about giving objective viewpoints on 9-11 or whether Obama is a Jew puppet or some other polarized question which sabotages our very core arguments? Why can't we learn from what happened to Trent Lott, Mel Gibson, Rick Sanchez, and countless other ZOG targets who felt an earth shattering hundred-thousand voice scream from the depths of Hell itself, wailing in unison from every Newspaper, TV show, and magazine against them? Why can't we incorporate our own "one voice" doctrine? Why hasn't any of this even been TRIED??
These answers could be given by these "leaders" over 1 night of earnest discussion among themselves, instead it's been 16 years.
I may only be an observer and not have the Egg of Columbus formula, but I know when I see something wrong.
SmokyMtn
December 18th, 2010, 06:08 PM
Lieberman says WTC 7 collapse never happened!
YouTube - 9/11 Joe Lieberman - WTC 7 Did Not Occur .... I Do Not Support A New Investigation
Perhaps we should remove him from his seat since he is totally detached from reality?
Heh heh heh,
Your TAX Dollars hard at work.
Rob MacGregor
December 18th, 2010, 08:39 PM
You know, after 16 years in the business you'd figure even the most preliminary steps would have been taken by the self proclaimed leaders of Stormfront (and elsewhere). Being a internet entity that floats ethereally does complicate things, especially since everyone is spread throughout a large nation, but they seem to meet each other at least sparingly as evidenced by the Jack Boot/Derek Black picture above.
So my question is, why has no step been taken to consolidate formally? Why during their dinners, or conferences, or whatever they did, these great White Nationalist leaders who wish to reclaim our country, did not start making policy with one another? If they took a step in a particular direction, whether right or wrong, they would have to take responsibility for it and therefore they will be judged by it. But such judgment comes with leadership, and winning isn't going to happen without such steps forward.
I have heard the line that " Stormfront is a forum for discussion, nothing more" used in its defense toward a lack of action. But that is not what Stormfront admin itself claims, they claim to be at the forefront of White Nationalism, the end-all-be-all for "the cause". After-all isn't that why they require $7,500 a month to sustain themselves?
Why have so many questions been laid out unanswered? What are we going to do? Who is the enemy? What is our policy towards X and Y? Who are "we"? Who is White? What can I do to help? What points should we use in our day-to-day arguments? What proper tone should we adopt on race-mixing/religious discussion/non-whites/9-11/holocaust/moon landings/ lizards in royal famiilies/UFOs mind controlling politicians/homosexuals/Iran/ etc etc etc. if any? Which personages currently involved in the scene do we ascribe as allies? Which personages do we hold in contempt as controlled dissent or utterly incompetent? The list goes on and on.
What about consolidating those enlightened persons into an identity? What about working towards unifying the thousands of WN out there with thousands of conflicting viewpoints with a umbrella belief system? What about teaching (re-teaching) those concerned whites about the strength of one voice? What about making them understand that there is only the subjective viewpoint and never the objective viewpoint when you deal in ideological war? Ask a rabbi any question with even the SLIGHTEST detail involving Judaism and he will only give a subjective answer. Why are there people who claim to be our side even THINKING about giving objective viewpoints on 9-11 or whether Obama is a Jew puppet or some other polarized question which sabotages our very core arguments? Why can't we learn from what happened to Trent Lott, Mel Gibson, Rick Sanchez, and countless other ZOG targets who felt an earth shattering hundred-thousand voice scream from the depths of Hell itself, wailing in unison from every Newspaper, TV show, and magazine against them? Why can't we incorporate our own "one voice" doctrine? Why hasn't any of this even been TRIED??
These answers could be given by these "leaders" over 1 night of earnest discussion among themselves, instead it's been 16 years.
I may only be an observer and not have the Egg of Columbus formula, but I know when I see something wrong.
Good questions.. the answer/my $0.02?
It was never intended to be more than what it is..(define it as you will) and it has morphed into a money making situation for certain individuals. The love of money is the root of all evil (IE: they who will sell out their own principles and people for money are the worst of the worst scum)
There may be deeper motivations as well. Many of these possibilities have been suggested in this torturous thread
Defender
December 19th, 2010, 03:39 AM
I was refering to stadgedog`s hissy fit thread about being banned from WNN. The thread you mention however shows that stadgedog is not a WN in that he is just another of those that thinks everyone should be supporting the army even though its doing nothing to protect America and is doing whatever israel wants. He is a puppet who supports puppets. He is the perfect SF recruit. To stupid to realise that the very people he supports are doing nothing to protect White people.
That Stagedog is still yapping about me...he must not have any life at all! I have had to do several blog posts in reply to his idiot remarks...the things he was saying about Gary and me on another forum without knowing either one of us was funny, but were also making me mad. Does he know how stupid he makes himself look?
http://susan1219.wordpress.com/2010/12/19/somebody-shut-this-idiot-up-reply-to-stagedog/
Fred O'Malley
December 19th, 2010, 10:04 AM
That Stagedog is still yapping about me...he must not have any life at all! I have had to do several blog posts in reply to his idiot remarks...the things he was saying about Gary and I on another forum without knowing either one of us was funny, but was also making me mad. Does he know how stupid he makes himself look?
http://susan1219.wordpress.com/2010/12/19/somebody-shut-this-idiot-up-reply-to-stagedog/
He is the very most stupid person I have ever seen online. There are uneducated people, there are non-english speaking people who write funny, but for pure stupidity, SD takes the cake. It wouldn't be so bad if he was just stupid, but he is evil to boot. (no pun intended)
He should go ahead with that sexually-gratifying hanging he's been contemplating.
Leonard Rouse
December 19th, 2010, 10:12 AM
That Stagedog is still yapping about me...he must not have any life at all! I have had to do several blog posts in reply to his idiot remarks...the things he was saying about Gary and I on another forum without knowing either one of us was funny, but was also making me mad. Does he know how stupid he makes himself look?http://susan1219.wordpress.com/2010/12/19/somebody-shut-this-idiot-up-reply-to-stagedog/
. . .the things he was saying about Gary and me. . .
. . .were funny, but were also. . .
SmokyMtn
December 19th, 2010, 10:24 AM
. . .the things he was saying about Gary and me. . .
. . .were funny, but were also. . .
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_X6bfacAhmsU/TJJOCteovuI/AAAAAAAABbs/qW68mbk4Y5M/s1600/Grammar-Nazi-2.jpg
http://www.pollsb.com/photos/o/22249-spelling_and_or_grammar_nazi.jpg
:D
Fred O'Malley
December 19th, 2010, 10:33 AM
Grammatical errors being hyped by some folks only demonstrate how focused they are on their own navel. "Live and let live" can be psychological too.
I'm convinced that most people do their best to convey their thoughts to a receptive audience. If that happens, then what's the beef? The anality of grammer nazis is a wonderment to behold. Their response, while self-justified as being helpful, is not. Mean & vicious should be reserved for one's spouse and offspring. :D
Leonard Rouse
December 19th, 2010, 10:34 AM
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_REkgXByDyuU/S7OQUFqK7eI/AAAAAAAAGyQ/uKpjRk7rwtM/s1600/grammar_nazi2.jpg
Donnie in Ohio
December 19th, 2010, 10:35 AM
Linder has some pretty strong veiws on that very subject.
I saw what you did there.
Well played. :D
Defender
December 19th, 2010, 10:35 AM
. . .the things he was saying about Gary and me. . .
. . .were funny, but were also. . .
I do a massive amount of writing and wrote that during the wee hours of the morning....but will go back and correct....
I am in college and I am a mainstream writer so I tend to let the grammar rules go for forums and blogs....
Donnie in Ohio
December 19th, 2010, 10:52 AM
Grammatical errors being hyped by some folks only demonstrate how focused they are on their own navel. "Live and let live" can be psychological too.
I'm convinced that most people do their best to convey their thoughts to a receptive audience. If that happens, then what's the beef? The anality of grammer nazis is a wonderment to behold. Their response, while self-justified as being helpful, is not. Mean & vicious should be reserved for one's spouse and offspring. :D
Oh, I'm not trying to be helpful to you Fred, although learning how to use spell-check would be an incidental boon of untold proportions to your ramblings, it's true.
I'm using you as a cautionary tale. Your tribulations, like Christ, will benefit others.
There is no 'e' in "grammar", btw. As for "anality"... was banality the word you were blindly grasping for, perhaps?
Leonard Rouse
December 19th, 2010, 10:52 AM
Grammatical errors being hyped by some folks only demonstrate how focused they are on their own navel. "Live and let live" can be psychological too.
On the contrary, it demonstrates focus on the writer's words.
I'm convinced that most people do their best to convey their thoughts to a receptive audience. If that happens, then what's the beef? The anality of grammer nazis is a wonderment to behold. Their response, while self-justified as being helpful, is not. Mean & vicious should be reserved for one's spouse and offspring. :D
Punctuation is something that can slide. . .can be formal or informal, can be toyed with, can be "wrong" yet still right in the correct context.
A misuse of the objective case can slide a little, sometimes, particularly in an informal setting.
Subject/verb disagreement is just stupid, but it happens to the best of us--hopefully infrequently. There's probably a rare exception where it serves some greater wordsmithing good, but I can't think of an example off-hand.
If one makes multiple egregious/semi-egregious grammatical errors leading up to "Does he know how stupid he makes himself look," then there's a big problem.
Leonard Rouse
December 19th, 2010, 10:57 AM
I do a massive amount of writing and wrote that during the wee hours of the morning....but will go back and correct....
I am in college and I am a mainstream writer so I tend to let the grammar rules go for forums and blogs....
I'm not riding you.
Don't open your mind so much that your brains fall out.
Borrow from physics, extrapolate for the written word and enjoy!
Good luck with your studies.
ray bateson
December 19th, 2010, 10:58 AM
On the contrary, it demonstrates focus on the writer's words.
I talk gooder than you.
Leonard Rouse
December 19th, 2010, 10:59 AM
Oh, I'm not trying to be helpful to you Fred, although learning how to use spell-check would be an incidental boon of untold proportions to your ramblings, it's true.
I'm using you as a cautionary tale.
There is no 'e' in "grammar", btw. As for "anality"... was banality the word you were blindly grasping for, perhaps?
That's a good word, anality. I like that one. I understood it immediately, anyway.
BTW, as you probably know, there is no "I" in "Team."
But there damn sure is a "Me."
YouTube - Rimshot
Leonard Rouse
December 19th, 2010, 11:03 AM
I talk gooder than you.
Yes, rb will show the way.
good
gooder
goodest
This English thing is easy.
Donnie in Ohio
December 19th, 2010, 11:15 AM
BTW, as you probably know, there is no "I" in "Team."
My senior year in HS football, we were so bad (0-10) that our Head Coach ended every half-time pep speech with a variation of "OK, we're probably not going to win this game down 35-0 (or whatever) at the half, so let's just try and not get hurt out there."
Truly inspirational.
Leonard Rouse
December 19th, 2010, 11:22 AM
My senior year in HS football, we were so bad (0-10) that our Head Coach ended every half-time pep speech with a variation of "OK, we're probably not going to win this game down 35-0 (or whatever) at the half, so let's just try and not get hurt out there."
Truly inspirational.
A true LOL.
You should be over at Chronicles or NRO, with an upbringing like that. ;)
Fred O'Malley
December 19th, 2010, 06:03 PM
You should be over at Chronicles or NRO, with an upbringing like that.
He should be in a straight jacket, chained to a bunk in a whorehouse for queers. :D
Peter Cordes
December 19th, 2010, 06:13 PM
A video by former SF poster Rassisten emerged on Youtube.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNsLpgLJ2d8
Rob MacGregor
December 19th, 2010, 07:17 PM
He should be in a straight jacket, chained to a bunk in a whorehouse for queers. :D
Is that the same as joining the US military?
John Liberty
December 19th, 2010, 07:30 PM
As for "anality"... was banality the word you were blindly grasping for, perhaps?
By Donnie
That one went right over Don's head,
anality
the condition or quality of having an anal character; collectively, the personality traits characteristic of the anal stage of psychosexual development.
Or, just acting like an anus, :D
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/anality
Fred O'Malley
December 19th, 2010, 07:48 PM
Is that the same as joining the US military?
I guess it is now. :D
Fred O'Malley
December 19th, 2010, 07:50 PM
That one went right over Don's head,
Not really a daunting task, given his obvious short comings. ;)
ScottRoberts
December 20th, 2010, 01:29 AM
This is a very important topic and you should all take the time to come to a full understanding of this "trick"/tactic. At which time you should then reflect back on the countless times you have witnessed it being played out before, so as to not have it go over your head next time they try it on you/us again.
Conversation will continue in this thread: http://theforbiddentruth.net/11347-jew-lieberman-wtc7-didnt-collapse.html#post62062
and the topic came up in response to this video: YouTube - 9/11 Joe Lieberman - WTC 7 Did Not Occur .... I Do Not Support A New Investigation
and yes, he just stood there with a straight face and claimed that he had "no evidence" of building 7 collapsing. WoW!
It is human Nature for people to believe things they think they are not supposed to know.
Is it possible they actually want us to know about WTC7 and that is why it was handed it to us on a silver platter? Think about how obvious they made it, then when we didn't catch it right away, they brought out Silverstein to confess on PBS. WTC7 has been the of the mantra false flag truth movement since 2003.
The enemy are professional psychologists. Lieberman is using reverse psychology to promote WTC7.
This trick is called Hegelian Dialectic
Interesting...
I enjoy breaking things down on this level, and I especially enjoy getting feedback on it from others. Where have the two of you been all this time? lol This could get "deep" and expand into countless subtopics as well.
The enemy are professional psychologists. Lieberman is using reverse psychology to promote WTC7.
This trick is called Hegelian Dialectic
Jews are indeed "professional psychologists" and they use the "Hegelian Dialectic trick" all the time. For instance, they have repeated this trick/process countless times in order to take our rights away. They convince the sheeple that they should worry about "crime" or "terrorism" based on psychological conditioning (through their media) and either false flag operations (9/11) or by merely highlighting some of the (desired) effects of "our" open immigration policy (in their media, of course). Thus, they create this "problem", they "oppose" it (as a way to highlight the "problem"), they convince the people that something must be done to stop the bleeding, then they do what they intended to do all along when they take our rights away. In a nutshell, they give us the solution to a problem that THEY created, but in reality the "solution" itself was the goal all along.
Simple example: Do you think Jane and John Doe would tolerate all of the harassment the TSA puts them through at the airport had they implemented these policies out of nowhere? Of course not. However, if you convince them that it is for their own good/safety, they will bite their tongues and deal with it.
The same can be said about so many other laws/restrictions on our freedom, taxes, wars, policies, and flat out violations of our most basic rights (as HUMAN BEINGS, not just as "citizens").
Seriously, they have relied on this "trick" so many times, you would think that people would have grown wise to it on at least the most basic level. In the end though, they know JUST how to play on "our" emotions and drive us to whatever conclusion/"solution" they desire. Laughing their asses off at each step along the way, since it is all too easy for them to repeatedly pull off.
It is human Nature for people to believe things they think they are not supposed to know.
They expend more effort setting up and controlling their "opposition" (leading the dissent) than they spend defending themselves directly (by far). And in doing so, they often rely on that very "trick" to guide us to the exact point they desired all along.
So you will have a person out there who is capable of the most basic level of critical thinking. They know something isn't right, but they just can't put their finger on it. Along comes "Alex Jones" or "Jesse Ventura" to "whisper" a little "secret" in their ear. Suddenly, they think they are onto something that they were not supposed to know about.
At this point, they won't go back to believing the "official" version they have come to reject (now reinforced by these new "secrets"), but they will also close themselves off to any further insights or facts, since they have convinced themselves (with help from Alex and the "Governor") to "believe" they've got it all figured out now.
continued (I haven't even watched the video yet, BRB)....
As far as WTC7 goes, it seems logical that that building was to be hit by the plane that was shot down. It's not unreasonable to think so. One of the Norad people did what he was supposed to do, and did not stand down, but instead shot that flight 93, i think it was, down.
As far as being handed it on a silver platter, I think it's the fact that these people are humans and they aren't perfect. It was a big operation and failure in certain aspects was bound to occur. Silverstein's confession may have been stupidity and a blunder, it's hard to say.
Lieberman is just a scumbag jew. He was at home (in the synagogue of satan) when he made those comments. Lying is second nature for these people. I don't personally see hegelian dialect involved in this but if you were to lay out more points I might be convinced.
Jews are human and fallible like every one else. They just don't behave like civilized humans. And that's ironic thing because you will always hear them yapping about what they've done for civilization. What a joke!
You're right, that's just a Jew finding himself cornered and not knowing how to react. They are VERY FAR from perfect! They slip up ALL the time, and they are easy to spot IF you simply know to question them and what to look for.
This was a sign of panic more than it was evidence of any Hegelian Dialectic being involved. I'd like to see some more points laid out as well, and would love to continue this discussion if "FlierFlyLilly" can expand on it.
9/11 itself was a clear case of Hegelian Dialectic, in several ways (it was a false flag operation after all), but I don't think that WTC7 was anything more than a severe (excuse the language) FUCK UP on their part right from the start.
Your theory on flight 93 makes the most sense as well (in that it never made it to its ultimate destination).
A. Crowe
December 20th, 2010, 03:48 AM
I didn't hear anything on the youtube video other than some really gay ass music once I turned the volume up. At which point do you actually get to hear him talking?
Bryan67
December 20th, 2010, 03:50 AM
WTC 7 was the most obvious blunder of many made that day & in the days that followed, so highlighting it would be the last thing the perpetrators would want to do. FlierFlyLady may have good intentions, but she's way beyond left field on this one. But if someone here actually understands what she meant, please translate ...
Eric Smith
December 20th, 2010, 03:55 AM
9/11 Truth: Videos all about BUILDING #7. What caused that 47 story Skyscraper to collapse when no planes hit it?
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t765544/
Fred O'Malley
December 20th, 2010, 06:35 AM
What caused that 47 story Skyscraper to collapse when no planes hit it?
I believe the answer to this is far more than obvious, pyrotechnical compounds and high explosives. Even Silverstein helps to clear this up, and he is obviously a central figure.
The fires, small as they were and oxygen-starved, couldn't possibly have cut through all the columns equally and universally, (without the aid of tissue boxes and tampons strategically located :rolleyes: ) all at the same time so as to cause universal coordinated failure.
The govt CT as to WTC 7 just defies logic among even the most gullible reviewer. If bldg. 7 was wired, then they were all wired.
John Liberty
December 20th, 2010, 11:26 AM
The govt CT as to WTC 7 just defies logic among even the most gullible reviewer. If bldg. 7 was wired, then they were all wired. by Fred
The kosher chutzpah was revealed when building seven went down, the jews are just to greedy and always go too far. If just the twin towers went down, there would be far less speculation by the general public, but the heebs just can't seem to control themselves. Even though 911 gave the heebs justification for everything that came after it, the neocon mods at Kosherfront banned the very people that were trying to expose this farce. And, by that act alone, SF has played it's hand and thrown it's lot in with the heeb side of the argument. The strong support they showed for the SFheeb-911-troll team as exposed them as inimical to White interests. (since the 911 myth is actually promoted there by the free rein of the trolls).
JB has now opened a new 911 forum in the revisionist section of SF in a sign of bogus contrition. I think he just wants to put the anti-911 news in a less traveled forum while trying to save what little face he has left after banning highly respected WN posters like the oldman. It is raising the governments 911 CT as an established event like the holohoax, and the people arguing against it as revisionists, (who are trying to change history) Revisionism is just another Orwellian term cooked up by the heebs for people seeking the truth about their devious past.
Excellent analysis by Ex-American, Ken O'keffe,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQbrMzMNbR0
littlefieldjohn
December 20th, 2010, 11:35 AM
Psychotic Jews, most notably Larry Silverstein, got sloppy with WTC 7.
This may be posted somewhere else but clink the link for a review of the Griffin book.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15230
Quote:
In Chapter 8, “The Initiation and Spread of Fires: NIST’s Unempirical Account,” Griffin examines closely NIST’s claim that the fires in WTC 7 started as a result of the rain of debris which hit the building when the North Tower disintegrated and fell. He shows that NIST’s claims that fires in the building started at this time ( 10:28 AM ) are unsubstantiated, and that the fires therefore could not have burned for as long as NIST contended they did. He points out that NIST itself admitted that most of the fires in the building may have started quite a bit later in the day, in the middle and late afternoon, and thus have burned for less than three hours and even as little as 40 minutes.
In Chapter 9, “Fire and Steel Temperatures: Implausible Claims Based on Distorted Data,” Griffin shows that NIST’s claims regarding the temperatures reached by the fires themselves and the steel structure of the building exposed to those fires are both wildly exaggerated. This extreme overestimation was made possible by the use of computer models, which were manipulated by NIST “investigators” to achieve the desired result (the agency had used the same method in its earlier reports on the destruction of the Twin Towers ). There is in fact no evidence to support the fire temperatures or the fire durations claimed by NIST. In a similar manner, NIST “simulated” the temperatures reached by the steel structure of the building, and claimed wildly implausible temperatures for which there is no actual evidence, based on the assumption (contrary to fact) that steel has no thermal conductivity!
In Chapter 10, “From Thermal Expansion to Global Collapse: Fabrications and Contradictions,” Griffin shreds the last pillar of NIST’s account: its claim that thermal expansion of steel floor beams and girders caused “global collapse.” He shows that this claim is based on highly implausible assumptions, outright fabrications, denial of the existence of structural elements that did in fact exist, and fabrication of a “differential thermal expansion” result from its computer simulations by modeling heating of the steel beams but not of the floor slabs! Griffin delivers the coup de grace by showing that NIST was forced to admit that WTC 7 did indeed fall at free-fall speed for more than two seconds during its collapse, which would only be possible if all resistance to the fall had been eliminated by removal of the lower portion of the building by explosives. This demonstrates that NIST has resorted to a miraculous “explanation” of the collapse of Building 7, in which no explosives were used and yet free-fall still occurred, and has thus violated the scientific principles of non-contradiction and impermissibility of claims implying that laws of nature have been violated.
Fred O'Malley
December 20th, 2010, 03:57 PM
Okay, I believe we have proved, by the plethora of factual data, that 9/11 was a jewish crime against America and the islamic world.
Shame-Front's rediculous troll squad mods' opinions notwithstanding. It is such a ludicrous proposition that they have now admitted their stupid egregious error and opened up a new thread, albeit out of sight as they could make it.
Shame-Front is aligned with the yids, there isn't much question of that.
We can prove the yids did it, but how do we bring them to justice?
My initial thought is a lawsuit with full blown discovery, initiated in state court, to allow for as much distillation of the facts as possible. This would cost about $2 million or more, to take it through the various courts, including appeals.
The whole idea is to get the facts into evidence and to destroy all credibility of the NIST report, which is the foundation of the govt's CT.
I think someone must rattle the hell out of the cages of the yid bastards who are responsible. I believe our best chance for success would be to file 5 individual cases within the same jurisdiction, then join the cases as a class action.
My main concern is jurisdiction and standing. To be successful, we would have to file into a friendly court. I think if we filed the cases and had them joined, we could attract many heavy hitters who would foot the bills.
Any thoughts or suggestions?
littlefieldjohn
December 20th, 2010, 05:32 PM
Okay, I believe we have proved, by the plethora of factual data, that 9/11 was a jewish crime against America and the islamic world.
Shame-Front's rediculous troll squad mods' opinions notwithstanding. It is such a ludicrous proposition that they have now admitted their stupid egregious error and opened up a new thread, albeit out of sight as they could make it.
Shame-Front is aligned with the yids, there isn't much question of that.
We can prove the yids did it, but how do we bring them to justice?
My initial thought is a lawsuit with full blown discovery, initiated in state court, to allow for as much distillation of the facts as possible. This would cost about $2 million or more, to take it through the various courts, including appeals.
The whole idea is to get the facts into evidence and to destroy all credibility of the NIST report, which is the foundation of the govt's CT.
I think someone must rattle the hell out of the cages of the yid bastards who are responsible. I believe our best chance for success would be to file 5 individual cases within the same jurisdiction, then join the cases as a class action.
My main concern is jurisdiction and standing. To be successful, we would have to file into a friendly court. I think if we filed the cases and had them joined, we could attract many heavy hitters who would foot the bills.
Any thoughts or suggestions?
the Ae911org group seems to think the best chances lie at the most local level, i.e. the Manhattan D.A. office, but as someone pointed out, any
effort will be met with a massive attempt to coerce and dissuade whichever court is petitioned.
Class action lawsuits , joined together , you should ask ae911, buildingwhat, Richard Gage, if they have considered this and if so, perhaps they looked at the expenses and decided it wasn't realistic.
I really fear that before there is a big enough of a groundswell demanding the truth and justice for the 9/11 murder victims, a new and exponentially worse
Israeli surprise attack/false flag will be perpetrated against us, that could make 9/11 look like an ice cream social, and quickly forgotten to the new horror.
Celtic_Patriot
December 20th, 2010, 05:37 PM
Be suspicious of anybody who introduces more elements than necessary into the 9/11 terror attack.
What happened on 9/11 is Israeli Mossad used already existing Boeing 767 and 757 commercial jet liners, which were already on large runways cleared for takeoff. It doesn't matter if White people were passengers or Arabs were passengers. That is irrelevant. The B767 and B757 aircraft can still have their cockpit cabin doors locked, and autopiloted to take off and crash into targets.
Go for the simplest explanation. Anybody who jumps in from nowhere and says that it must have been some unproveable mystery aircrafts is providing false leads. Do not be gullible.
The most realistic explanation is to simply load up Boeing 757s and 767s with actual paying passengers at Logan airport, lock the cockpit door, autopilot the plane to takeoff and flying into target. No need to rent secret White run CIA airports with snuck in Israeli Mossad agents and trick the CIA. Not going to happen.
Absence of evidence in any one small area should not make an investigator go off on a different tangent. The majority of the evidence is all that is needed.
Remember to simplify the crime, that keeps it lock solid and reduces witnesses and collaborators. No big heavy computers needed to be loaded, just a software installation. Software installation, painted thermite. Radio detonators in sequence. Done deal.
.
littlefieldjohn
December 20th, 2010, 05:42 PM
Be suspicious of anybody who introduces more elements than necessary into the 9/11 terror attack.
What happened on 9/11 is Israeli Mossad used already existing Boeing 767 and 757 commercial jet liners, which were already on large runways cleared for takeoff. It doesn't matter if White people were passengers or Arabs were passengers. That is irrelevant. The B767 and B757 aircraft can still have their cockpit cabin doors locked, and autopiloted to take off and crash into targets.
Go for the simplest explanation. Anybody who jumps in from nowhere and says that it must have been some unproveable mystery aircrafts is providing false leads. Do not be gullible.
The most realistic explanation is to simply load up Boeing 757s and 767s with actual paying passengers at Logan airport, lock the cockpit door, autopilot the plane to takeoff and flying into target. No need to rent secret White run CIA airports with snuck in Israeli Mossad agents and trick the CIA. Not going to happen.
Absence of evidence in any one small area should not make an investigator go off on a different tangent. The majority of the evidence is all that is needed.
Remember to simplify the crime, that keeps it lock solid and reduces witnesses and collaborators. No big heavy computers needed to be loaded, just a software installation. Software installation, painted thermite. Radio detonators in sequence. Done deal.
.
100% correct. A trial lawyer goes for one clear-cut discrepancy to catch a witness in a lie, and that poisons the entire testimony.
Bring forces to bear on the weakest point.
However, I agree with Gage at AE911truth, that the weak points are in how the buildings fell, especially building 7.
I don't know how locking the door of the cockpit with no one inside could evade notice by the flight attendants or even seasoned passengers.
Like any unsolved homicide, perhaps there will be a 'break' in the case soon.
A. Crowe
December 20th, 2010, 05:48 PM
http://img337.imageshack.us/img337/2642/dxasj.jpg
:hflol
Armstrong
December 20th, 2010, 05:49 PM
An indicator that 9/11 was a planned and scripted event is indicated by the fact the collapse of WTC 7 was announced on Television quite a while before it happened.
I was watching television on 9/11 and caught that right away.
The commentator said WTC 7 had collapsed when it was still standing. The network suddenly had 'connection problems' and took her off the air.
A. Crowe
December 20th, 2010, 07:50 PM
http://img413.imageshack.us/img413/7677/98509142.jpg
:hflol
littlefieldjohn
December 20th, 2010, 08:30 PM
[QUOTE=A. Crowe;1211466]http://img413.imageshack.us/img413/7677/98509142.jpg
:hflol[/QUOTE
:hflol
That pic is his avatar too , too funny.
Roy
December 20th, 2010, 11:40 PM
Be suspicious of anybody who introduces more elements than necessary into the 9/11 terror attack. Software installation, painted thermite. Radio detonators in sequence. Done deal.
.
There really is no need to bring in thermite into the equation for implicating the kikes. This is one of the "more elements than necessary" that you mentioned. Many discussions get side tracked with this thermite talk, and it takes the pressure off the kikes and takes it into la-la land. Just accept that a 767 loaded with fuel is enough to bring down a building, and that is enough. WTC 7 is a separate case that obviously was a controlled demo.
It's tempting to go round and round about "thermite" but it doesn't do anything but get the heat off the kikes. Just look at the video of the WTC collapsing, there is no huge fire-ball that one would expect to accompany an explosion.
It's clear that the WTC I and II buildings fell in a completely different manner than WTC 7. This is can simply be explained that they were demolished using different methods. Stated simply, a 767 getting rammed into a building is going to destroy the building.
Kind of late in the discussion to bring it up, but it deserves mentioning.
A. Crowe
December 20th, 2010, 11:48 PM
[QUOTE=A. Crowe;1211466]http://img413.imageshack.us/img413/7677/98509142.jpg
:hflol[/QUOTE
:hflol
That pic is his avatar too , too funny.
I know, he cropped the head out of it, and thinks it is a joke, but the joke is on him, because it couldn't be any closer to the truth.
Can anyone on SF please forward this to exnihilo? Tell him happy hanukkah from Whitepwr88. :hflol
Eric Smith
December 21st, 2010, 12:25 AM
Stormfront's Brand New "9/11 Truth" Sub-Forum (under Revisionism)
Which now contains at least thirty-one 9/11 threads (I just got a mod to move twenty-one 9/11 threads into the new 9/11 Truth Forum. Check the 9/11 threads out below:
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/f202/
I would encourage all former Sf members, to call in to the Sf office, (it worked for me. I just got the answering machine. Perhaps give them your email? Sorry, I don't have the number handy.) and request that your account be reactived. Sf needs you guys POLITELY posting valuable information on the forum.
We can't let mikhaelis ruin the threads any longer. It's time to fight back and influence the new "9/11 Truth" Forum.
SOLDIER ON!!!
AussieWN
December 21st, 2010, 01:26 AM
There really is no need to bring in thermite into the equation for implicating the kikes. This is one of the "more elements than necessary" that you mentioned. Many discussions get side tracked with this thermite talk, and it takes the pressure off the kikes and takes it into la-la land. Just accept that a 767 loaded with fuel is enough to bring down a building, and that is enough. WTC 7 is a separate case that obviously was a controlled demo.
It's tempting to go round and round about "thermite" but it doesn't do anything but get the heat off the kikes. Just look at the video of the WTC collapsing, there is no huge fire-ball that one would expect to accompany an explosion.
It's clear that the WTC I and II buildings fell in a completely different manner than WTC 7. This is can simply be explained that they were demolished using different methods. Stated simply, a 767 getting rammed into a building is going to destroy the building.
Kind of late in the discussion to bring it up, but it deserves mentioning.Sorry Roy but a plane filled with fuel will not bring down a building. Thats just part of the jewish lie. Jet fuel burns at 800 DEGREES..definatly not hot enough to cause steel to melt
AussieWN
December 21st, 2010, 01:29 AM
Stormfront's Brand New "9/11 Truth" Sub-Forum (under Revisionism)
Which now contains at least thirty-one 9/11 threads (I just got a mod to move twenty-one 9/11 threads into the new 9/11 Truth Forum. Check the 9/11 threads out below:
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/f202/
I would encourage all former Sf members, to call in to the Sf office, (it worked for me. I just got the answering machine. Perhaps give them your email? Sorry, I don't have the number handy.) and request that your account be reactived. Sf needs you guys POLITELY posting valuable information on the forum.
We can't let mikhaelis ruin the threads any longer. It's time to fight back and influence the new "9/11 Truth" Forum.
SOLDIER ON!!!The admin on SF will never allow any of us back. Even those of us who walked away instead of being banned will not be welcomed back. The admin know that we will ask questions that they do not want asked and that they are not prepared to answer.
SmokyMtn
December 21st, 2010, 01:33 AM
I would encourage all former Sf members, to call in to the Sf office, (it worked for me. I just got the answering machine. Perhaps give them your email? Sorry, I don't have the number handy.) and request that your account be reactived. Sf needs you guys POLITELY posting valuable information on the forum.
We can't let mikhaelis ruin the threads any longer. It's time to fight back and influence the new "9/11 Truth" Forum.
SOLDIER ON!!!
Yes, we can let mikhaelis ruin whatever he desires. Many of us will never go back.
Hold off, for now, on the suggestion for others to reactivate their accounts. Wait at least another two weeks.
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.